Tuesday, September 27, 2011

BMC open spaces policy rebuffs greens TNN Jun 25, 2011, 05.35am IST[THE FUTURE GENERATIONS OF MUMBAI AND INDIA WILL WONDER WHY WE ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN]


The Times of India
MUMBAI: The civic administration is reluctant to drop the caretaker policy for open spaces despite vociferous opposition from green activists. It plans to adopt an amended version that municipal commissioner Subodh Kumar finalized on Thursday night. The draft proposes to allow the caretaker to commercially exploit 25% of a plot above 50,000 sq feet, while making him pay for maintenance of the remaining 75%, physical possession of which the BMC plans to retain with itself.
The BMC claims this is because it can't afford to develop and maintain the city's 1,200 reserved open spaces. Aseem Gupta, additional municipal commissioner, said the BMC would have to incur a one-time expenditure of around Rs 1,000 crore just to develop the plots, which would take at least five to seven years.
The civic body will put up the final draft proposal on its website by June 28 so that citizens can send in their objections and suggestions within 30 days. Thereafter there will be a public hearing. The administration may modify the proposal if there are valid suggestions and then put it before the Improvements Committee for its approval. After the general body too gives its approval, it will be sent to the state government for the go-ahead .
However, Neera Punj, convenor , Citispace, a citizens' group that has been fighting to save the city's few open spaces said it was a crying shame that the BMC was unwilling to provide Mumbaikars their much-needed green space.
"All it takes is Rs 100-odd crore annually , which the BMC can easily afford, to maintain all green spaces in the city. The BMC is giving so much to builders, why does it need to touch the open spaces? The caretaker policy must be completely done away with. Not a single inch of open space should be allowed to be encroached upon ," she said. PK Das, architect and civic activist, said the whole exercise seemed to be aimed at destroying the quality of life in the city.
Mum

Save open spaces in Mumbai: Citizens’ groups -Published: Monday, Sep 13, 2010, 23:41 IST By Linah Baliga | Place: Mumbai | Agency: DNA[THE FUTURE GENERATIONS OF MUMBAI AND INDIA WILL WONDER WHY WE ALLOWED THIS TO HAPPEN]





Citizens’ groups from all over Mumbai are gathering to kick-start a campaign to save the city’s 800-odd public open spaces by demanding the repeal of the government’s caretaker policy.
On November 26, 2007, a similar campaign had culminated in an open letter to the chief minister by eminent citizens. It resulted in a stay on the policy. Citispace, an NGO fighting for the protection of Mumbai’s open spaces, convened a meeting on Monday to mobilise various citizen’s associations to come forward and protect open spaces — playgrounds, gardens and parks — in their respective wards.
“The BMC claims insufficient funds as the reason to allow commercial activity involving extensive construction and concretisation on public open spaces, when, in fact, the funds are more than enough,” said Neera Punj, convenor, Citispace. “We have made the calculations and it amounts to Rs103.4 crore for maintaining a total of 940 acres of open spaces in Mumbai. The budget allocation for the period 2010-11 can sufficiently cover this.
“We will empower citizens’ groups to treat open spaces as their personal property, so that they can lobby with the government to demand that they don’t want a caretaker policy or an adoption policy. They will write to the chief minister just like we have done for the A ward.”
Nayana Kathpalia, co-convenor, Citispace, said: “In the past, the BMC could not afford to maintain gardens and parks. It has now said that advance locality managements (ALMs) will get the first choice in adopting gardens. But it’s an uphill struggle for citizens’ groups to raise sponsorship for these gardens.
“In the past, we may have had agreed to adopt gardens, but it’s not our job. The entire policy of the BMC is wrong. We will put pressure through residents to impress upon the government that the policies must be repealed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Jun 25, 2011, 05.35am IST


The Times of India
MUMBAI: The civic administration is reluctant to drop the caretaker policy for open spaces despite vociferous opposition from green activists. It plans to adopt an amended version that municipal commissioner Subodh Kumar finalized on Thursday night. The draft proposes to allow the caretaker to commercially exploit 25% of a plot above 50,000 sq feet, while making him pay for maintenance of the remaining 75%, physical possession of which the BMC plans to retain with itself.
The BMC claims this is because it can't afford to develop and maintain the city's 1,200 reserved open spaces. Aseem Gupta, additional municipal commissioner, said the BMC would have to incur a one-time expenditure of around Rs 1,000 crore just to develop the plots, which would take at least five to seven years.
The civic body will put up the final draft proposal on its website by June 28 so that citizens can send in their objections and suggestions within 30 days. Thereafter there will be a public hearing. The administration may modify the proposal if there are valid suggestions and then put it before the Improvements Committee for its approval. After the general body too gives its approval, it will be sent to the state government for the go-ahead .
However, Neera Punj, convenor , Citispace, a citizens' group that has been fighting to save the city's few open spaces said it was a crying shame that the BMC was unwilling to provide Mumbaikars their much-needed green space.
"All it takes is Rs 100-odd crore annually , which the BMC can easily afford, to maintain all green spaces in the city. The BMC is giving so much to builders, why does it need to touch the open spaces? The caretaker policy must be completely done away with. Not a single inch of open space should be allowed to be encroached upon ," she said. PK Das, architect and civic activist, said the whole exercise seemed to be aimed at destroying the quality of life in the city.
Mum
Mu

Linah Baliga, TNN Jul 29, 2011, 06.11am IST
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





MUMBAI: Citizens might lose access to a quarter of Dadar's Shivaji Park and Mahim's Dhote Udyan if the BMC's draft of its controversial open space caretaker policy gets government approval. The draft proposes to give 25% of these recreational grounds, and several others spread across the city, to private parties for the maintenance of the remaining area. The private parties can commercially exploit the 25% area by building structures like clubhouses and gymnasiums. The area will be walled, barring access to the average citizen.
The provision of the wall has further peeved citizens' groups, who are stridently opposed to the policy draft. "(This) is like gifting away people's precious land. It is deplorable and outrageous. The BMC is selling public land, and this is unacceptable," said Neera Punj, convenor of the NGO Citispace.
Co-convenor Nayana Kathpalia called the walling idea absurd. "It will make 25% of recreational grounds exclusive for the caretaker; the area will be lost forever," she said. "Where does the BMC get such ideas from?"
Ashok Ravat, member of the NGO Walker's Ecological Movement, said: "Carving out a portion of a recreational ground and walling it is detrimental to the concept of vacant , public spaces. A continuous open space gives more relief to stressed citizens.
"The draft is highly objectionable. Denying the public access to 25% of such land will not be allowed."
Defending the draft, a senior official from the BMC's estates department said: "It is essential to demarcate 25% of a ground given on caretaker basis so that the (private party) has its own boundary. Demarcation is necessary for members-only entry."
The reason the BMC has cited for drafting the caretaker policy is a need of funds to develop 1,200 reserved open spaces. The caretaker will be made to pay to avail of the facility, while physical possession of a ground (of area above 5,000 sq m) will continue to rest with the BMC.
The draft, apart from being ecologically unsound, is a gross misinterpretation of the Development Control Regulations, according to which only ancillary structures like gardener's hut, security guard's post and storerooms are allowed on a reservation of a recreational ground plot. Buildings like clubhouses and gymnasiums are designated as separate reservations, and are not ancillary structures.
But the BMC claims that it needs to seek private participation to develop public open spaces as per DCR reservations. Calling the claim misleading, Ravat of Citispace reiterated that the built-up area on 25% of recreational grounds would be permanently parcelled off to a private party. He said: "This is a lacuna created solely for commercial interests."







The Times of India
M

u




BMC to buy open spaces
  • India


  • Sep 25, 20
  • 11
clip
SANJAY DESHPANDE Mumbai
Widely criticised for its policy on open spaces, BMC now plans to purchase open plots reserved many years ago for gardens. The civic body has prepared a new proposal for acquisition of 4,545 sq m of reserved space at a cost of Rs 22 crore.
The proposal is for purchasing six open spaces, five from Andheri and one plot from Malad. These open spaces measure up to about 4,545 sq m and will be purchased at a cost of over Rs 22 crore. A decision on these proposals is likely to be taken in the improvements committee on Wednesday.
Corporators across the party lines are in favour of purchasing the open spaces.
Congress corporator Vinod Shekhar said, " Though we support purchase of the open plots, the track record of the Shiv Sena and the BMC administration has been dismal in this respect.
He blamed ruling Shiv Sena - BJP combine for not developing many open spaces.
" Since 2005, the BMC has cleared over 50 purchase notices, but more than 90% plots have not been developed yet because of inefficient ruling party in civic body," alleged Shekhar. The current plots had been reserved way back in 1993, sources said.
Improvements Committee chief, BJPs Bhalchandra Shirsat said, " Most of the members are in support of purchasing open spaces and we will take a decision in the committee meeting." Currently, the city has only 0.03 acre of open space per 1,000 people or a mere 1.95 sq m per person, as against the international standard of 11 sq m. The Maharashtra Regional Town Planning ( MRTP) Act requires acquiring the plot reserved for public amenities as per the reservation envisaged in development plan ( DP) within 10 years of approval of citys town plan.
The owner can serve a notice to the corporation under section 126 of the MRTP and ask the civic body to purchase the plot.
If the corporation did not purchase it, the reservation lapses under section 127 of MRTP. Plans to purchase 4,545 sq m of reserved space for Rs 22 crore SIX open spaces, five in Andheri and one in Malad to be bought by the civic body Right step Currently, the city has only 0.03 acre of open space per 1,000 people or a mere 1.95 sq m per person, as against the international standard of 11 sq m
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    The BMC claims this is because it can't afford to develop and maintain the city's 1,200 reserved open spaces
    Ravat of Citispace reiterated that the built-up area on 25% of recreational grounds would be permanently parcelled off to a private party. He said: "This is a lacuna created solely for commercial interests."




    Monday, September 26, 2011

    BOOK NO ;-18-The origin of Bombay By Joseph Gerson Da Cunha


    The origin of Bombay

     By Joseph Gerson Da Cunha:-http://books.google.co.in/books?id=miD5YO05jpUC&pg=PA195&lpg=PA195&dq=HISTORY+OF+ST+BONAVENTURE+CHURCH+BOM#v=onepage&q&f=false

    A.D. 1694-DARKEST DAY OF BOMBAY- The 'Unfortunate Isle of the East' was plague-stricken, empty, and ruined. Of 800 Europeans only fifty were left, six civilians, six commissioned officers, and not quite forty English soldiers. There was only one horse fit to ride and one pair of oxen able to draw a coach.


                                                               

    HISTORY
     http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/pdf/gazeetter_reprint/Thane-II/histroy_marathas.html#1

    Bombay continued very depressed. In 1694


    trade was in a miserable state; the revenue had fallen from £5208 to £1416 (Rs. 52,0S0-Rs. 14,160), the cocoa-palms were almost totally neglected, and there were only a hundred Europeans in the garrison.[Bruce s Annals, III. 164.] 

    in 1697, there were only twenty-seven European soldiers. [ Bruce's Annals, III. 215.] In 1701 Mahim and other stations had been strengthened, but the garrison was weak.



    The Marathas[SHIVAJI], 


    Photo courtesy of Wayne B. Chandler


    Moors[SIDDIS FROM KONKAN], 





    The town of Muscat



    Arabs[FROM MASKAT], 



    Portuguese soldiers in Asia.

    and Portuguese were ready to attack Bombay,






     and if reinforcements were not sent the island must be lost. [Bruce's Annals, III. 439.]


     

    Added to this the plague broke out in the island, 



    carried off some-hundreds of the natives, and reduced the Europeans to the small number of seventy-six men. 


    The plague was followed by a storm which destroyed the produce of the island and wrecked the greater part of the shipping. [Bruce's Annals, III. 502-503.] 


    In 1708 the king of Persia proposed to send an envoy to arrange with the English a joint attack on the Maratha and Arab pirates. But the Governor was forced to decline; Bombay was in no state to receive an envoy

    A.D. 1694-The 'Unfortunate Isle of the East' was


     plague-stricken, empty, and ruined. Of 800 Europeans only fifty were left, six civilians, six commissioned 


    officers, and not quite forty English soldiers. There was only one horse fit to ride and one pair of oxen able to draw a coach.[Anderson's English in Western India, 128, 163, 171-172.]

    Bombay that had been one of the pleasantest places in India was brought to be one of the most dismal deserts.[Hamilton's New Account, I. 240.]


     [Between 1684 and 1688 Bombay was the centre of English commerce with Western India. [Khafi Khan, who 'seems to have visited Bombay before Child's troubles began, was much struck by its strength and richness.]


    Inside of the fortress from the gate, on each side of the road, was a line of English youths of twelve or fourteen years, shouldering excellent muskets. At every step were young Englishmen with sprouting beards, handsome and well-clothed with fine muskets in their hands. Further on were Englishmen with long beards alike in age, accoutrements, and dress. Further on were Englishmen with white beards, clothed in brocade, with muskets on their shoulders, drawn up in two ranks in perfect array. Next were some English children, handsome and wearing pearls on the borders of their hats.





     Altogether there must have been nearly seven thousand musketeers, dressed and armed as for a review. Elliot and Dowson, VII. 351-352.]


     Then came the collapse and the years of deadly depression and of strife between the London and the English Companies, ending in 1702 in the formation of the New United Company.



                                                           Pirates, 1700.


    The sea seems to have been specially troubled with pirates. The most dangerous were the Europeans, of whom Captains Every,

     Kidd, 


    and Green were the most notorious. Hamilton notices two nests of European pirates, near Madagascar and on the east coast of the Bay of Bengal. [Hamilton's New Account, I.19, 43, 320; II 67. Accounts are also given in Low's Indian Navy, I. 78.] 


    Next to the European pirates the most formidable were the Maskat Arabs,
    who sometimes with fleets of as many as 1500 men scoured the west coast of India. [Low's Indian Navy, I. 311, 312, 321. Hamilton's New Account, I.139.. Hamilton, perhaps on the ground of their common hate of-the Portuguese, was well treated by the Maskat Arabs. Ditto, I. 71, 76.] 
    Along the west coast of India were many nests of pirates, of which the chief were 


    the Sanganiaus on the north coast of Kathiawar,
     the Warels of Chhani on the south coast,


     the Sidis, 


    Marathas, Angrias and 





    Savants in the Konkan, 


    Captain Roberts and Pirates on Malabar Coast

    Captain Roberts and Pirates on Malabar Coast


    A scene from the film, Kunjali Marikkar
    ‘Kunjali Marakkar,
    and the pirates of Porka on the Malabar coast[Hamilton's New Account, I. 134, 141247; Low's Indian Navy, I. 97.]
    ENGLISH CALLED INDIAN KINGS AND FREEDOM FIGHTERS AS PIRATES ;INCLUDING KANHOJI ANGRE OF KONKAN AND KUJALI MARIKKAR OF  MALABAR

                            Bombay, 1710-1720.
    After, the union of the London and the English Companies in 1708, Bombay began to recover from its deep depression.
    By 1716, the population had increased to 16,000, provisions were abundant, and thanks to the building of a strong dyke at the Great Breach, much of the salt swamps had dried, and the climate was pleasant and with care as healthy as England. 

    BOMBAY FORT GATE CALLED"CHURCH GATE"
    The Town Wall was finished in 1716, 





    and the Cathedral was begun in November 1715 and finished in 1718[Bom. Quar. Rev. 33-38; Hamilton's New Account, I. 188. Hamilton (New Account, I. 21) describes Mr. Boone, under whom these improvements were made, as a gentleman

            Bombay 1727
    ' Bombay had two towns or kasbas,Bombay and Mahim;


     it had eight villages, Mazgaon, Varli, Parel, Vadala (between Parel and Matunga), Naigaon (south of Vadala and north of Parel), Matunga, Dharavi, and the island of Kolis or Kolaba;


     it had seven hamlets, two, Aivaris and Gauvari under Vadala; two, Bamanvali and Coltem? under Dharavi, and three, Bhoivada, Pomala, and Salgado under Parel; and it had 


    five Koli quarters under Bombay, Mazgaon, Varli, Parel, and Sion. 


    There were three saltpans, at Kasli north of Matunga, Siwri, and Vadali. 


    The estimated produce and revenue of the different parts of the island were, of the towns, Bombay 40,000 cocoa-palms, some rice lands, and old rice-lands now built on, and Mahim 70,000 coooa-palms and 592 mudds of rice. Of the eight villages, Mazgaon yielded 184 mudas of rice and bad 250 brab-palms, with a yearly revenue of about Xms. 4000; Varli 34 mudas worth about Xms. 7000; Parel, including its three hamlets, 154 mudas and some brab-palms yielding about Xms. 4000; Vadala, with its two hamlets, 75 mudas and some brab-palms Xms. 1900; Naigaon, 42 mudas and some brab-palms Xms. 1000; Matunga 65 mudas and 100 brab-palms Xms. 1700; Sion, 54mudas and a few palms Xms. 1400 ; Dhravi, with two hamlets, 23 mudas and a few brab-palms Xms. 625. Kolaba worth Xms. 400C to Xms. 5000. The salt-pans yielded Xms. 2300 and the Koli suburbs about Xms. 7000. There were two distilleries,bandharastis (?), at Bombay and at Mahim. Of other sources of revenue the Bombay and Mahim customs-houses yielded about Xms. 52,000, a tobacco tax Xms. 19,000, an excise Xms. 12,000, quit-rents Xms. 3000, and the Mahim ferry Xms. 1200. The total was roughly estimated at Xms. 160,000. The fortifications of the island were, the castle with six bastions begun in 1716, well armed; a small fort on Dongri; a small bastion at Mazgaon, wife a sergeant and 24 men and 3 guns; Siwri fort on the shore, with asubhedar and 50 sepoys and from 8 to 10 guns; the small tower and breastwork of Sion, with a captain and 62 men and nine or ten guns; three bastions at Mahim, with 100 men and 30 guns; a fort on Varli hill, with an ensign and 25 men and seven or eight guns; the island of Patecas (Butcher's" Island) belonging to Mazgaon, with a fort, begun by General Boone in 1722, and about seventy seamen and six or seven guns.]
    bombay 1729 to 1731



    Kanhoji's death in 1731 and the struggles that followed among his sons lessened the power of the Angrias.




    A SIDDI NAWAB OF SACHIN 1930


    A few years later (1734), the death of siddi Yakub Khan and a disputed succession lowered the power of the Sidis, and in 1735 the Peshwa took many of his forts. [Grant Duff, 231-232.]

    The Konkanasth Brahmans, now the first power in the Konkan, were able to turn their whole strength against the Portuguese, whom they hated as Christians and as strangers, and for whose ports and rich coast-lands they had long hungered. The Marathas began to press the Portuguese. Year after year news reached Bombay that the Marathas had seized a fresh Portuguese fort, or appropriated the revenues of one more Portuguese district. In 1731 Thana was threatened, and the Government of Bombay, who felt that the success of the Marathas endangered their island, sent three hundred men to garrison Thana, but soon after withdrew the aid


    Attack  by/on the Portuguese,1739.


    In 1737, by siding with Sambhaji Angria against the Peshwa's friend Manaji Angria, the Portuguese gave the Marathas a pretext for attacking them.

    The first step taken by the Marathas was to attack the island fort of Arnala, off the mouth of the Vaitarna. The fort was taken and the commandant and the garrison put to the sword




    The Marathas next (April 1737) attacked Salsette, took



    FORT Ghod-bandar and put the garrison to the sword, and, gaining command the river, prevented help being sent from Bassein to Thana.





     At  Thana FORT , though the fort was well advanced, the defences were unfinished. The captain fled to Karanja, and though the garrison made a gallant defence, successfully driving back two assaults, in the end they were forced to capitulate.

    The English sent men and ammunition to



    Bandra FORT,[for the portuguese] but the defences were useless and the place was abandoned, and fell to the Marathas without a struggle.




    In 1738 the Portuguese made strenuous efforts to regain what they had lost. They defeated the Marathas at Asheri, and a gallant attack on Thana might have succeeded, had not the English warned the Marathas of the Portuguese[against Portuguese]  preparations and supplied the garrison with powder and shot. [ Bom. Quar. Rev. IV. 79. This caused the bitterest ill-feeling between the English and the Portuguese



    In January 1739 Chimnaji Appa, the Peshwa's brother, took command of the Maratha troops, and, in spite of obstinate resistance, captured most of the northern forts, Katalvada, 
    The Dahanu Fort
    Dahanu,


     Kelve,

     Shrigaon FORT, and 





    Tarapur FORT , whose walls were scaled by the Marathas, the Portuguese 'fighting with the bravery of Europeans,' till they were overwhelmed by numbers. 



    Versova FORT 

    and Dharavi FORT in Salsette, which still held out for the Portuguese, next surrendered, and the siege of Bassein was begun.


    NO PROPER REPAIR OF INDIAN FORTS ARE  BEING DONE; FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS TO SEE AND ENJOY


                                                Fall of Bassein, 1739


    The commandant of Bassein offered to pay tribute, but the offer was refused; he appealed to the English at first in vain, but he afterwards received from them a loan of £1500 (Rs. 15,000). [Bom. Quar. Rev. IV. 82-83.] The siege was pressed with the greatest skill and perseverance, and Angria's fleet blocked all hope of succour. Still, with the help of some Portuguese lately come from Europe, so gallant was the resistance, little less brilliant than the heroic defences of Diu and Chaul, that before Bassein was taken three months (17th February-16th May) had passed and 5000 Marathas were slain

    VASAI FORT NOW

    VASAI FORT 


    The garrison was allowed to march out with the honours of war, and those who wished to leave the country were granted eight days in which to collect their property




    Except five churches, four in Bassein and one in Salsette, which the Maratha general agreed to spare, every trace of Portuguese rule seemed fated to pass away.






    [The conduct of the British in refusing to help the Portugese has been severely blamed (Nairne's Konkan, 83; Bom. Quar. Rev. IV. 82). Portuguese writers go so far as to state that the English supplied the Marathas with engineers and with bombs (Joze de Noronha, 1772, in O. Chron. de Tis. II. 16). According to Grose, who wrote in 1750, the reasons why the English did not help the Portuguese were, ' the foul practices' of the Kandra Jesuits against the English interest in 1720, their remissness in failing to finish the Thana fort, and the danger of enraging the Marathas, whose conduct of the war against the Portuguese deeply impressed the English. Voyage, I. 48-51.]






     As they were no longer able to hold them, the Portuguese offered the English





     Chaul FORT 



    and Korlai fort 




    on the south bank of the Chaul river. The English could not spare the men to garrison these places, but trusted that by ceding them to the Marathas they would gain their regard, and might be able to arrange terms between the Portuguese and the Marathas. The Portuguese placed their interests in the hands of the English. The negotiation was entrusted to Captain Inchbird, and though the Marathas at first demanded Daman and a share in the Goa customs, as well as Chaul, Inchbird succeeded in satisfying them with Chaul alone. Articles of peace were signed on the 14th of October 1740








     Bombay was little prepared to stand such an attack as had been made on Bassein. The town wall was only eleven feet high and could be easily breached by heavy ordnance; there was no ditch, and the trees and houses in front of the wall offered shelter to an attacking force



    A ditch was promptly begun, the merchants opening their treasure and subscribing £3000 (Rs. 30,000) ' as much as could be expected in the low state of trade'; all Native troops were forced to take their turn at the work; gentlemen and civilians were provided with arms and encouraged to learn their use; half-castes or topazes were enlisted and their pay was raised; the embodying of a battalion of sepoys was discussed; and the costly and long-delayed work of clearing of its houses and trees a broad space round the town walls was begun. Though the Marathas scoffed at it, threatening to fill it with their slippers, it was the ditch that saved Bombay from attack.




    for nearly twenty years Bombay lived in fear and trembling. In 1750, Grose laments that the friendly, or, at worst, harmless belt of Portuguese territory that used to guard them from the Marathas was gone. They were face to face with a power, unfriendly at heart, whose officers were always pressing the government to lead them to Bombay, and let them raze its wretched fort and pillage its markets





    [Grose gives interesting particulars of these terrible Marathas, who had taken Thana and Bassein, and who held Bombay in the hollow of their hands. Most of them were land-tillers called Kurumbis, of all shades from deep black to light brown, the hill-men fairer than the coast-men. They were clean-limbed and straight, some of them muscular and large bodied, but from their vegetable diet, light, easily overborne in battle both by Moors and by Europeans. Their features were regular, even delicate. They shaved the head except the top-knot and two side curls, which, showing from the helmet, gave them an unmanly look. The rest of their dress was mean, a roll of coarse muslin round the head, a bit of cloth round the middle, and a loose mantle on the shoulders also used as bedding. The officers did not much out figure the men. To look at, no troops were so despicable. The men lived on rice and water carried in a leather bottle; the officers fared little better. Their pay was small, generally in rice, tobacco, salt, or clothes. The horses were small but hardy, clever in rough roads, and needing little fodder. The men were armed with indifferent muskets mostly matchlocks. These they used in bush firing, retreating in haste to the main body when they had let them off. Their chief trust was in their swords and targets. Their swords were of admirable temper, and they were trained swordsmen. European broadswords they held in contempt. Their targets were light and round, swelling to a point and covered with a lacquer, so smooth and hard that it would turn aside a pistol shot, even a musket shot at a little distance. They were amazingly rapid and cunning. The English would have no chance with them. They might pillage Bombay any day. [Grose's Voyage, I. 83. In spite of this Maratha thunder cloud, Bombay was advancing rapidly to wealth and importance.]


     Bombay was no longer the Britons' burying-ground




    n 1753 (1st December) the Government wrote to the Court; ' The number of inhabitants has so greatly increased that the crowded people are murmuring to have the town enlarged. Some very considerable bankers from Aurangabad and Poona have opened shops to the great advantage of trade.' (Warden's Landed Tenures, 77). This increase in prosperity was partly due to very liberal instructions about attracting strangers to Bombay in a letter from the Court dated 15th March 1748. (See Bom. Quar. Rev. V. 164)








    Mild management and religious indifference, allowing Hindus, Musalmans, Parsis, even Catholic 'Christians the free practice of their forms of worship, had tempted so many settlers that every inch of the island was tilled, and, in proportion to its size, yielded much more than Salsette. Among the Marathas, Bombay had a perilously great name for wealth. Its noble harbour was the centre of trade between Western and Upper India and the Malabar coast, the Persian Gulf, and the Bed Sea. Its well-built though badly placed castle and its costly moat made it one of the strongest of the Company s Indian possessions.



    Uniforms of the East India Company's private army,
    circa 1843
     


                                                                Bombay Native Infantry








    The military force was of three branches, Europeans, Natives, and a local militia. The Europeans were either sent from England or were Dutch French and Portuguese deserters, or they were topazes that is half-Portuguese. The sepoys had English officers, wore the Indian dress, and carried muskets, swords, and targets. They were faithful and with European help they were staunch. The local militia of land-tillers and palm-tappers would prove useful against an invader








    Next to Angria, perhaps equal to Angria, the English were the first naval power on the west coast. They had succeeded to the old Portuguese position of granting passes to native craft. [PASSES were granted by Child at least as early as 1687. Hamilton's New Account, I. 202, 216. The toon of pass used in 1734 is printed in Bom. Quar. Rev, IV. 188.






                                              Fall of Angria, 1757.




    Fortunately for Bombay the Marathas remained friendly until two events, the destruction of Angria's power in 1757 and the crushing defeat of the Marathas at Panipat in 1761, raised the English to a position of comparative independence.





                                                               

                                                            Suvarnadurg fort

    In 1755 the Marathas and English made a joint expedition against Angria. The Marathas proved feeble and lukewarm allies, but the English fleet under Commodore James took the important coast forts of Suvarndurg and Bankot in the north of Ratnagiri. In 1757, strengthened by the presence of Admiral Watson and of Colonel Clive, the English attacked and took the great coast fort of Vijaydurg in Ratnagiri, burnt Angria's fleet, and utterly destroyed his power.





    In the next year they gained command of Surat castle and became Admirals of the Moghal fleet. 



    Dutch Factory at Surat  1634
    Fig. 12. J.A. VON MANDELSLO AFTER P. VAN DEN BROECKE
    Dutch Factory at Surat 1634 



    So encouraged were they with this success that, in 1760, they were bold enough to side with the Sidi against the Marathas and to hoist the English flag 







    at Janjira FORT.





    The defeat of Panipat in 1761

    Maratha Ruler Balaji Bajirao



    the death of the Peshwa Balaji Bajirav, and the succession of a minor, freed the British from present fear of the Marathas. [On the 7th January on the field of Panipat, fifty-three miles north of Delhi, the Marathas under Sadashivrao Bhau were defeated by the Afghans, and the Peshwa's brother and cousin, chiefs of distinction, and about 200,000 Marathas slain. Balaji Bajirav the Peshwa died heartbroken in he following June.


                                   Bombay, 1760-1770
    Meanwhile, Bombay had been growing larger, richer, and healthier. In 1757 Ive describes it as the most flourishing town in the world ' the grand store-house of all Arabian and Persian commerce'






    HOPE THE PEOPLE AND GOVERNMENT OF INDIA WILL SAVE THE HUNDREDS OF FORT S FROM TOTAL DESTRUCTION AND DECAY