Bombay Photo Images[ Mumbai]

Friday, November 22, 2013


AI overviews are experimental. Learn more…Opens in new tab
Listen
Yes, the Dabhol Power Station in Maharashtra, India is currently active as of January 31, 2024. The 1,967 MW gas-fired power plant resumed operations in 2015 after a two-year hiatus due to a shortage of domestic gas. However, the plant has had to stop operating frequently due to losses and a lack of buyers for its expensive electricity. In 2015, the plant's owner, Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private Limited (RGPPL), was split into two companies to ensure a regular supply of natural gas:
  • Ratnagiri Power: Manages the power plant
  • Konkan LNG: Operates the LNG facility 
    Wikipedia
    Dabhol Power Station - Wikipedia
    After repairs to the equipment, the power station resumed operations at 100% of its installed capacity of 1967 MW in 2010, however it has had to often stop operation due to losses and a lack of buyers for its expensive electricity. As of 2016, the power plant continues to operate at a loss, selling energy to the MSEDCL and Indian Railways at a highly inflated rate. In 2015, it had a debt of Rs. 10,500 crore. In a bid to revive the loss making plant, in September 2015, the Company owning the power plant RGPPL was split into two separate Power and LNG entities, one to manage the power plant and the other to manage the import of LNG.
    Power Technology
    Dabhol Power Plant, Ratnagiri District, Maharashtra, India
    26 Feb 2021 — The plant resumed operations in 2015, following a two-year hiatus. To ensure a regular supply of natural gas, RGPPL was split into two firms, namely Ratnagiri Power and Konkan LNG. Ratnagiri Power manages the power plant, while Konkan LNG operates the LNG facility.
    The Economic Times
    Dabhol power plant recommences production
    26 Nov 2015 — NEW DELHI: Dabhol power plant in Maharashtra today recommenced electricity generation after remaining shut for nearly two years. #Elections with ET. Lok Sabha Voting Phase 3: All the latest news. "The Dabhol power plant, owned by Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private Limited (RGPPL), restarted electricity generation this morning after having been shut for nearly two years due to shortage of domestic gas," an official release said. The plant is producing 290 MW power initially which will be sold to the Indian Railways, it said. "The electricity generation will be further scaled up in the coming months.
    Power Technology
    Power plant profile: Dabhol Power Station, India
    31 Jan 2024 — Oil and gas in North Africa: How intelligent fibre sensing is transforming Algeria's pipeline security. Premium Insights. January 31, 2024. Power plant profile: Dabhol Power Station, India. Brought to you by. Thermal. Share. Dabhol Power Station is a 1,967MW gas fired power project. It is located in Maharashtra, India. According to GlobalData, who tracks and profiles over 170,000 power plants worldwide, the project is currently active. It has been developed in multiple phases. Post completion of construction, the project got commissioned in 1998. Buy the profile here. Smarter leaders trust GlobalData. Premium Insights Dabhol Power Station.
Why did Dabhol fail?
Who is the owner of Dabhol Power Plant?
What was the particular background to the Dabhol Power project?
Show more

Search Results

Featured snippet from the web

Dabhol Power Station - Wikipedia
The power plant was finally rehabilitated and taken over by Ratnagiri Gas and Power (RGPPL), which successfully revived and operates the plant.

 Dabhol lies idle but consumers continue to pay

Ashish Roy, TNN | Nov 22, 2013, 03.05 AM IST
0
comments
0
inShare
Share More
A
A
READ MORE massive loan default|Dabhol lies idle
NAGPUR: The Union ministry of power (MoP) has suddenly woken up from its deep slumber over the 1,980 MW Dabhol plant lying idle since July 15 as banks have sounded an alarm over a massive loan default. Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private Limited (RGPPL), the company that runs the plant, collectively owes Rs8,500 crore to ICICI Bank, IDBI Bank, SBI and Canara Bank.

However, the state government has never taken up the issue with MoP even though MSEDCL consumers are paying around 17 paise per unit for a plant that is not generating a single unit of electricity. The consumers are effectively paying over 19.5 paise per unit due to electricity duty. The state government is pocketing this 2.5 paise per unit amount. Interestingly, MSEDCL, which is collecting this money from consumers, is not passing it on to RGPPL, which has complained to MoP in this regard.

This is not the first time that consumers are being unnecessarily penalized for the jinxed plant. They had paid a surcharge of 35 paise unit for four months from December 2009 to March 2010 to meet extra Rs650 crore maintenance cost of Dabhol.

Even otherwise Dabhol power has almost been the costliest for MSEDCL. According to MSEDCL official if the plant functioned at full capacity then the price of power would have been around Rs3.75 per unit (at earlier Reliance gas price). "However, when it functions at only one-third capacity it increases to Rs5.81 per unit. This shows that whenever the generation reduces the power rate goes up because the fixed cost remains the same."

The 17 paise per unit surcharge was finalized by Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (MERC) in the tariff order for 2012-13. RGPPL was to be paid Rs1,854 crore as fixed charges by MSEDCL in addition to variable charges that depend on fuel cost.

Dabhol needs 8.5 mmscmd (million standard cubic meters per day) gas for running at full capacity of 1,800 MW. However, the supply from Reliance' KG basin has been dwindling continuously and now has stopped completely. The plant can't be run on imported gas because it is far costlier and will make power rate too high.

RGPPL is in bad financial shape.[Ratnagiri Gas and Power Private limited (RGPPL] It incurred a loss of Rs1,156 crore in 2012-13 as the generation was less by over 9,000 million units (MUs) than the target. This is up from over 3,000 MUs in 2011-12.
.....................................................................................................




Newer Post Older Post Home

Blog Archive

  • ►  2025 (44)
    • June (14)
    • March (1)
    • February (17)
    • January (12)
  • ►  2024 (940)
    • December (14)
    • November (17)
    • October (5)
    • September (95)
    • August (184)
    • July (161)
    • June (132)
    • May (44)
    • April (97)
    • March (145)
    • February (46)
  • ►  2023 (56)
    • December (12)
    • November (2)
    • October (27)
    • August (11)
    • July (2)
    • May (1)
    • January (1)
  • ►  2022 (2)
    • October (1)
    • July (1)
  • ►  2021 (59)
    • December (2)
    • November (9)
    • October (6)
    • September (1)
    • June (7)
    • May (22)
    • April (3)
    • February (4)
    • January (5)
  • ►  2020 (114)
    • December (16)
    • November (17)
    • October (2)
    • August (4)
    • July (2)
    • May (1)
    • April (6)
    • March (10)
    • February (39)
    • January (17)
  • ►  2019 (22)
    • December (7)
    • November (5)
    • October (1)
    • September (1)
    • May (1)
    • March (1)
    • February (4)
    • January (2)
  • ►  2018 (48)
    • December (2)
    • November (3)
    • October (13)
    • September (3)
    • August (3)
    • June (5)
    • May (7)
    • April (5)
    • March (4)
    • February (2)
    • January (1)
  • ►  2017 (87)
    • December (18)
    • October (4)
    • September (1)
    • July (46)
    • June (3)
    • May (1)
    • April (6)
    • March (5)
    • February (3)
  • ►  2016 (37)
    • November (1)
    • October (8)
    • September (4)
    • August (6)
    • July (3)
    • June (1)
    • May (2)
    • April (3)
    • March (3)
    • February (2)
    • January (4)
  • ►  2015 (59)
    • December (9)
    • November (3)
    • October (3)
    • September (5)
    • August (5)
    • July (6)
    • June (11)
    • May (5)
    • April (5)
    • March (1)
    • February (3)
    • January (3)
  • ►  2014 (121)
    • December (5)
    • November (5)
    • October (2)
    • September (3)
    • August (14)
    • July (3)
    • June (9)
    • May (9)
    • April (29)
    • March (17)
    • February (11)
    • January (14)
  • ▼  2013 (191)
    • December (8)
    • November (19)
    • October (23)
    • September (8)
    • August (19)
    • July (14)
    • June (11)
    • May (15)
    • April (35)
    • March (12)
    • February (7)
    • January (20)
  • ►  2012 (100)
    • December (34)
    • November (19)
    • October (13)
    • September (4)
    • August (5)
    • July (15)
    • June (7)
    • February (1)
    • January (2)
  • ►  2011 (252)
    • December (1)
    • November (7)
    • October (55)
    • September (50)
    • August (4)
    • July (1)
    • June (15)
    • April (8)
    • February (34)
    • January (77)
  • ►  2010 (1070)
    • December (135)
    • November (3)
    • October (18)
    • September (20)
    • August (95)
    • July (411)
    • June (197)
    • May (190)
    • March (1)
  • ►  2009 (37)
    • August (1)
    • June (16)
    • February (20)
  • ►  2008 (21)
    • July (21)
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.