Karma calling? Country that used divide-and-rule split over Brexit

Rudroneel Ghosh | TNN | Updated: Jan 4, 2020, 16:23 IST

TNN

Front-page headlines on the day general election results were announced illustrate the divisions in the United Kingdom over Brexit

NEW DELHI: With

Brexit

now certain to become reality, the

UK

as we know is sure to undergo significant transformations. On the political front, the recent British elections exemplified a clear split in British society. Although the pro-Brexit Conservative Party of

Boris Johnson won the day

, the anti-Brexit camp remains considerable but divided. Take the example of

Scotland

where the anti-Brexit Scottish National Party won by a landslide. This potentially sets up another Scottish referendum. Then, while Johnson has negotiated a new Brexit arrangement for Northern Ireland, the effectiveness of the plan to prevent a hard border between the British Irish territory and the Republic of Ireland is yet to be tested.

What all of this means is that psychologically the UK is no longer one entity. Brexit has

fundamentally challenged Britain’s projection

of itself in the world. UK can no longer claim to be a champion of liberal values as Brexit was primarily driven by a desire to keep out foreigners and take back control of immigration and UK’s borders. Where once Great Britain saw itself as a modernising force for the world — a perception that also underpinned British colonialism in centuries past — today it stands a divided nation where parochial forces have gained the upper hand.

Which brings into question the credibility of British soft power. For the last 200 years, English was seen as the language of progress. It was the lingua franca of science, political theory, diplomacy and finance, and a window to progressive ideas such as equality of justice,

democracy

and

human rights

.

But in light of Brexit, all of that is coming apart. According to American political scientist Joseph Nye — who coined the term soft power in the late 1980s — a country’s cultural, ideological and institutional attractiveness could help it shape the world. And until recently, Britain had deployed these soft assets brilliantly. But with Brexit, all of this risks boomeranging on the UK. For, as soon as British openness started being seen as a liability by a considerable section of the British population given a slowing economy and changing British demographics, racism and nativism reared their ugly heads. Fears began rising that the white British population would soon be overwhelmed by people of colour and outsiders. It is these regressive forces that are dividing Britain today and undermining its position as a cultural powerhouse.

Perhaps it is all karma. After all, Britain for centuries had divided people on the basis of ethnicity, religion and sects to profit from it. It drew arbitrary lines in the sand and sowed the seeds of generations-long communal strife. We in the subcontinent are well aware of the deep scars that Britain’s divide-and rule policy inflicted upon us. Today, it is the Britons’ turn to be divided on ideological – and possibly sectarian and ethnic – grounds. And with British openness, fairness and multiculturalism now undermined by Brexit, the pull of the UK as a destination for talent is also likely to fade. British politicians may think that they can manage the situation and maintain British soft power supremacy. But that would be arrogance — the same arrogance that saw certain British politicians boost regressive forces by proposing Brexit for political gains.

Soft power was really the UK’s biggest asset since it was overshadowed by the military power of the US in the earlier half of the 20th century. And with the global axis of power shifting from the West to the East, the decline in British soft power is bound to hurt the UK even more. In that sense, Britain risks becoming an old, sclerotic nation with little real influence in the world. Many would say it serves them right.

 y: