Sunday, February 22, 2009

THE MAKERS OF THE RED SEA STEAM NAVIGATION.1836




THE MAKERS OF THE RED SEA STEAM NAVIGATION.

MR. J. WEST LAKE has presented  with a little book,      gilt edged and bound in green, the perusal of which might embolden the young aspirant to write a history of Overland traffic. Printed and published in Calcutta in 1837,
it contains a letter of Dr. Dionysius Lardner, of Cyclopedia fame, addressed to Lord Melbourne, then Prime Minister, on Steam Communication with India by the Red Sea.
Lord Melbourne, then Prime Minister,
That was the year when some halting lines appeared in a Bombay journal.

"Let us set up three lines instead of one
Ere the Red Sea line has fairly begun ;
! weep by the waters of Babylon
O'er two lakhs spent and still more to pay,
Besides a few mails th.it have gone astray."

The £20,000 referred to was the Government grant to defray the cost of the Euphrates expedition — a region which the elder Cheney did so much to elucidate.

                                                                      Pioneers.

The earliest proposal for steam navigation by the Eed Sea is the following ironical notice which appears in the Asiatic Journal for May, 1822 : — " A Captain Johnston has suggested a plan for opening an intercourse with India by means of steam vessels, and the details he has furnished respecting it are so specious, and all the obstacles in the way of its success are so admirably disposed of, that it is astonishing the projector has
not been deluged with contributions or subscriptions already, and that a steamer is not unloading in the port of Suez." *

Mountstuart Elphinstone in 1823

 was the first to make a distinct official proposition for the establishment of steam communication between Bombay and England via the Red Sea, and in 1826 he renewed the proposal, but the Court were
unwilling to act upon the suggestion.

Sir John Malcolm
Sir John Malcolm
Sir John Malcolm

[His final diplomatic appointment in India was as the Governor of Bombay and he served in this capacity from 1826 until his return to England in December 1830.
As Governor of Bombay, Sir John had political responsibility for Gujarat, including Kathiawar and Kutch. He heard good reports of the contribution that Swaminarayan�s teachings were making towards peace and harmony in the area and when he visited Rajkot in February of 1830, he asked the Acting Political Agent David Anderson Blane to arrange a meeting. Although he was by this time in poor health, Swaminarayan came to meet Sir John Malcolm at the Political Agent�s bungalow. During this meeting Sir John Malcolm asked for a copy of the Swaminaryan�s religious code and was presented with a copy of the Shikshapatri.]


contributed to the cause the weight   of his great authority, and in December, 1830, he himself embarked on the Hugh Lindsay 


to Cosseir, this being her second voyage. " A pleasanter voyage," says Sir John, " was never made."
 Of Sir Robert Grant, Governor 1835-38,

(1779–1838)
He was born in India, the son of Charles Grant, chairman of the Directors of the Honourable East India Companyn 1834 was appointed Governor of Bombay and GCH
The Oldest Medical College in MumbaiIndiaGrant Medical Collegeis named after Sir Robert Grant. Grant Road and Grant Road Station in Mumbai (Bombay) are named after Governor Grant.He died in India in 1838.
the verdict of the Bombay Press on his death was : — " He did very much to promote the Overland route by the Red Sea."

These are conspicuous names, and the honour and glory of the first is not dimmed by the luster of the second or even  by that of the third. They simply followed in the train of their illustrious forerunner. With the furtherance of this great scheme there are many names associated, and these are not lightly to be passed over. Each in his day and sphere did his own work.
 But all their exertions would have been futile had it not been that they were contemporaneous with the rise of that great man Mohammed Ali, who in peace and in war was
the friend and patron of the Overland route through his Egyptian dominions. He overawed the Arabs and made the desert as secure for life and property as the highways of London.

Dr. Wilson's opinion as expressed in the Oriental Christian Spectator of 1841, of which he was the editor, on one of the foremost men in this work during " the thirties," is in these terms :

 " William Taylor Money, partner of Forbes and Co., and afterwards her Majesty's Consul at Venice, was the most prompt and energetic advocate of steam navigation in Bombay."

And it redounds to his eternal honour that at a meeting in Calcutta in 1828, where the Cape Route was supported by Commodore Hayes, Captain Johnston, and Waghorn himself  Low's Indian Navy, 1877.

Mr. J. A. Prinsep had the hardihood to state that letters might be conveyed, from Calcutta to Cosseir in twenty-nine days, thence to Cairo in two days, and thence to London in twenty- three days, doing the entire distance in fifty -four days. But it was a voice crying in the wilderness.

                                                            Meetings in Bombay.

The first meeting in Bombay to promote the Red Sea route  was on the 17th April, 1830, shortly after. Taylor's arrival. I suppose that the name of



Robert Wigram Crawford, M.P. for the City, and Director of the Bank of England, should be a good authority on the question as to whom we owe Red Sea steam communication.* A partner of Remington and Co., Bombay, in 1836, he was in the thick of the fight. He has left it on record that the overland route between India and England was due to the community of Bombay, as represented by the
Bombay Steam Committee.
 On May 8th, 1833, the Sheriff was asked to convene a meeting in the Town Hall for the furtherance of the object. Sir Herbert Compton was in the chair, and among the earliest subscriptions were Compton,

 SG # 1439
Jaggnath Sunkersett (Educationist & Railway Pioneer) 




Jejeebhoy, [Sir JamsetjeeJejeebhoy, 1st Bt]

Ali Rogay, Rs. 1,000 each. Ritchie Steuart and Co., Forbes and Co., W. Nicol and Co., Adam, Skinner and Co., Remington and Co., Rs. 1,500 each. This was the sinews of war, and before November, 1833, the Bombay Steam Fund amounted to Rs, 1,30,000.

It was to this Steam Committee that Waghorn made his last appeal. " For myself, as I have devoted the best years of my life to this line of route, I offer my remaining ones at your disposal for providing greater rapidity for letters and comfort for passengers between you and England. I pray you to assist me, and if my  onscience does not deceive me I firmly believe you will have just cause to congratulate yourselves as well as yours, , Thomas Waghorn, Alexandria, 11th Dec, 1839."

Thomas Waghorn, ca. 1847
by Sir George Hayter

Between 1835 and 1837 he lived among Arabs in the desert and laid the foundations for the overland route across the desert fromCairo to Suez. This involved building rest-houses and supplying guides, boats, horses and carriages for travelers.



"Care of Mr. Waghorn" 2 May 1839 by the Overland Mail, Calcutta via Egypt and France to London
He became deputy consul in Egypt in 1837, but soon fell out with the authorities. From 1840, P&O set up in competition with him, backed by the British government. Then came another setback: 300 horses died in a plague. It was the end—and the Pasha bought him out.
Waghorn turned his attention to speeding the post in Europe, through the new railway system. He was successful, but the Government reneged on a deal to pay his expenses for the trials left him £5,000 in debt.
Waghorn died at his London home in Islington on 7 January 1850. He was buried at All Saints', Snodland, just outside the vestry door. The south wall of the nave bears a memorial to him


Again on March 16th, 1836, another meeting was convened by the Sheriff, W. C. Bruce, in the Town Hall to consider the   Who that saw him could ever forget him. He stood six feet four inches in his white stocking soles — a wonderful physique.

subject . of steam communication with England, which the papers describe as " the burning question of the day."

It was following the meeting of 1836 that in 1838 the over land route was established by a monthly mail from Suez, conducted by the Indian Navy, and, though we now anticipate, Bombay never paused in the work of steam acceleration by the Red Sea. In the year 1853 there were serious delays in the Overland Mails, The London mail of June 8th was delivered in Bombay on July 26th, that of June 24th on August 3rd, that of July 8th on August 25th, the last being forty-eight days in transmission. There is a limit to human forbearance, so a
great meeting was called in the Town Hall on September 3rd, 1853. That meeting was a memorable one, and the men who took part in it deserve to have their names recorded as bene- factors of their species.

I have no doubt that this meeting had a great deal to do with the withdrawal of the mail service from the Indian Navy and the substitution of the contract in 1855 for monthly mails by the P. and 0. Co. from London to Bombay. John Stuart, David M'Culloch, Robert Eyrie, J. Graham, Thomas Lancaster, L. A- Wallace, J. Hadow, Richard Willis, T. S. Cowie, Henry Scott and Nelson Howard sign the requisition. John
Smith, of William Nicol and Co., was in the chair. Berkeley, the Engineer, was there,


a splendid speaker. Bhau Daji
 followed, and


John Wilson's work went beyond the field of education. He was a Linguist, an Orientalist, a Reformer, an Author. In recognition of his service to the cause of education, social awakening and scholarship, the Department of Archives. Government of Maharashtra, in 2000 honoured Dr. John Wilson as one of the Seven Founders of Modern Bombay.


 Dr. Wilson by special invitation, as he was always interested in every question that affected the happiness of the     public. Of these men (1895) Messrs. Robert Eyrie, James Graham, J. Hadow, and L. A. Wallace are still surviving. Confining ourselves to the practical demonstration of Red Sea Steam Navigation, we ought never to lose sight of the fact that it was during 


[portrait of Sir John Malcolm]
He returned to India in 1817, and on his arrival was attached, as political agent of the governor-general, to the force under Sir Thomas Hislop in the Deccan. With the rank of brigadier-general, he was appointed to the command of the third division of the army, and greatly distinguished himself in the decisive battle of Mehidpoor, when the army under Mulhar Rao Holkar was completely routed. For his skill and valour on this occasion he received the thanks of the house of commons, on the motion of Mr. Canning, who declared that “the name of this gallant officer will be remembered in India as long as the British flag is hoisted in that country.” His conduct was also noticed by the prince regent, who expressed his regret that the circumstance of his not having attained the rank of major-general prevented his being then created a knight grand cross, which honour, however, was conferred on him in 1821.
                              

                              After the termination of the war with the Mahrattas and Pindarries, he received the military and political command of Malwa, and succeeded in establishing the Company’s authority, both in that province and the other territories adjacent, which had been ceded to them.
                              In April 1822 he returned once more to Britain with the rank of major-general. Shortly after, he was presented by the officers who had acted under him in the late war with a superb vase, valued at £1,500. The court of directors of the East India company likewise testified their sense of his merits by a grant to him of £1,000 a-year. In July 1827 he was appointed governor of Bombay, which important post he resigned in 1831, and finally returned to Britain



Malcolm's administration (1828-30) the Hugh Lindsay was built, launched, equipped, and despatched to Suez on March 20th, 1830. Here were deeds not words. Waghorn- and Taylor did not arrive in Bombay until March 21st, or the day after, and it is a curious circumstance to note that while
Waghorn at this time advocated the Cape Route, Taylor was in favour of the Red Sea, and still more strange that Waghorn soon after this should become the undisputed apostle and prominent advocate of the Red Sea, while Taylor was killed by the Arabs

this very year of 1830 while conveying an English mail through the deserts of Mesopotamia.
The "Hugh Lindsay."
The foundation of steam navigation in the Red Sea was without the shadow of a doubt the Hugh Lindsay, the first steamship constructed in Bombay (411 tons). She was named after Captain Hugh Lindsay, a man of great bravery, who forced his way to the Canton Palace. In 1865 she broke her back in the harbour of Bassadore.
 Her first four voyages to
Suez were made from Bombay : —
1830 March 20th.
1830 December 5th.
1832 January 5th.
1833 January 14th.

Her passenger accommodation was taken up months before. Several parties, travelling overland 1,000 miles, were dis- appointed, though arriving two months prior to the time fixed for her departure. We are particular in these details, for they are the initial letters of all steam navigation in the Red Sea. These four voyages were the basis of the Resolution of a Committee of the House of Commons in 1834, and finally led to the
decision in 1837, which settled once for all the Red Sea route. Captain John H. Wilson, of the Indian Marine, who commanded the Hugh Lindsay, made seven voyages in her to Suez. He may be fairly regarded as a rival to Waghorn. "
 He retired in 1838, but from that time to the day of his death in December, 1875, he never received any acknowledgment, honorary or other- wise, for his great services in promoting steam communication
between England and the East."

                                                               The Experimental Voyage.

There must be some men alive in Bombay who witnessed  the first departure of the Hugh Lindsay for Suez on March 20th, 1830. That was an event worthy of being recorded — the sailing of the first steamer (she was launched in 1829), and the first steamer which cleared out of our harbour for Suez. Did she steal away past Kennery as private as pestilence, or was her departure heralded by sound of trumpet, or the roar of great
guns dying away among the ghauts, and wakening echoes from Thul to the jagged peaks of Karnala and Bhaumalang ? Did the boys, Hindoo or Parsee, scuttle away from Bennett's School, No. 6, Rampart Row, to see the fun ?

Sir John Peter Grant, having resigned, was in low spirits at the Hermitage. But John Skinner was at Mazagon, James Wright at Belmont, Mazagon, Harry George Gordon in Nisbet Lane, and John Smith at Love Grove. Surely there would be a gathering at one of these lordly mansions to drink success to the Red Sea Route, amid bumpers of wine. What about the theatre ? Did a favourite piece of that time. Ways and Means,
or a Trip to Dover, foreshadow the multiplied wishes for a new route and the wherewithal to accomplish it ?

Did Archdeacon Jeffreys preach a sermon on it ? " Those that go down to the sea in ships," with counsels of temperance, to which the ribald sailor replied in such doggerel as this : —
" Mr. Jeffreys, God bless you, We're fain to address you
In reply to your Temperance Log,
As we really can't see What great harm there can be  In a moderate potion of grog."

                                                 Bombay a Point of Departure.

It is very easy in 1895 to sit down complacently and wonder why anybody could ever doubt that Bombay should be the point of arrival and departure of the Indian Mails. "By virtue of its inherent geographical position, and its nearness to Europe" — and so you settle the question once for all. No doubt Bombay's position on the map is unchangeable, and apparently unassailable. But carry yourself back to 1837 and
listen to the voice of India — and India, bear in mind, with no Suez Canal, with running postmen in lieu of railway com- munication to Calcutta, with no Aden as a coaling station, with steam vessels of 400 tons, such as they were. You may also bear in mind that Moresby's survey of the lied Sea was not completed until 1834, and in that year Captain Wilson, who had made four voyages to Suez in the Hugh Lindsay, stated
tha!, during the navigation of such a steamer across the Indian Ocean, the South-West monsoon so operates as — if not to prevent the communication — at least to render it useless.

Calcutta had a waterway on the Ganges for a distance of a thousand miles for the distribution of mails and passengers, while you had not a single river on the western side of India, Napier, " the bearded vision," having not yet put in an appear- ance on the banks of the Indus, As against this great water highway what had you to show ?

When your mails and passengers were landed in Bombay you had dawk and palanquin through countries recently acquired, or owning at least a nominal subjection to us. What sort of comfort had you to
show to ladies and families travelling to Calcutta by weary stages in the heat and the rains, those two factors which, Dr. Lardner remarks, all the wealth and science of the world are unable to eliminate (almost eliminated now by railway to Calcutta) ? Calcutta now was the capital of India, with tlnice the ad valorem of your commerce. Her merchants were princes.

When a commercial typhoon raged (1830-32) five of them succumbed with liabilities amounting to fifteen millions sterling ! Everything was on a larger scale in Calcutta. Of 3,500 passengers who came annually to India round the Cape, poor Bombay received 600, instead of 6,000, which every year she now receives with open arms.

The commerce of India, I read, is now worth 200 millions sterling. I am sure it was not half this amount in 1837. British India's population was then one hundred millions instead of three hundred millions of to-day. And think of the steamers of 1837. Would any shipowner nowadays dispatch a steamer of four hundred tons across the Indian Ocean during the violence of the monsoon ? And, when all was settled, consider for a moment what your introduction of steam navigation meant. The vested interest of sailing ships was
enormous. Not alone Green's line of clippers, but a whole fleet of Indiamen scoured the seas, for a funnel had scarcely been seen as yet on the Indian Ocean. It must be borne in  mind also that there was a fierce and a bitter hostility against

steamers by all seafaring men. The Indian Marine simply hated them and their passenger proclivities. Captain Wilson was the only one of that service who had the courage to volunteer and take command of the Hugh Lindsay in 1830.

I should imagine that 
Gillray Mental Energy


Lord Clare's voyage out by the Red Sea in 1836 rather staggered all lovers of that route. His six months' weary journey from London to Bombay, varied by a forced halt of six weeks at Jeddah, waiting for coals from Suez, must have left a bad taste in his mouth. He at all events had enough of the Eed Sea, and I do not wonder that his efforts to promote its navigation have been left unrecorded.

                                      Red Sea Route Decided Upon.

We read on May 30th, 1837, that the Red Sea Eoute once for all was decided on by Government. The Government and the East India Company had taken seven years to make up their mind. The Cape route by steam had many advocates, even Waghorn himself, as we have said, at an early stage of his career. If I remember rightly, £10,000 was offered to whoever should bring the first steamer to Calcutta by the Cape.

The Enterprise, of 500 tons, came out in 1826, and Government purchased her for £40,000 ; but she took 115 days. Sailing vessels have done the passage in seventy-seven days from the Lizard to Bombay, and on one occasion in sixty-six days. Then there was the Euphrates Valley route, to test which Government voted £20,000. A Mr. J. W. Taylor, agent for some capitalists in London, and brother of Major Taylor,
Resident at Bagdad, left Bombay on May 2nd, 1830, with letters via Bussorah. The party left Bagdad in September, and, within three marches from Mosul, Taylor and two Englishmen were murdered. This was a deathblow to the Euphrates Valley steam communication.

                                                         The plague at Bagdad and consequent quarantine
 of thirty days in Bombay was a most formidable obstacle to any communication by this route, and it was no sham. The first officer of a ship which attempted entering the harbour about this time without pratique was shot dead.

There must be people alive who have spent a quarantine of thirty days in the lazaretto on Butcher's Island.

                                                                        WAGHORN.

It is not easy to estimate the encouragement which the Bombay Steam Committee and the Chamber of Commerce after 1837 gave to Waghorn, when we remember that the Government had pronounced the Red Sea un navigable, and the East India Company laid documents before Parliament showing that the scheme was impracticable, because coals cost £23 a ton at Suez, and took fifteen months to get there ! Waghorn
dissipated all these delusions, and rose superior to the frowns even of the Bombay Government. What is harder to bear than opposition is neglect.

" Give me the avowed, the erect, the manly foe,
Whom I can face, or else avert the blow."

We have now before us in Dr. Lardner's book the following documents : —

A letter to Lord Mt-lbourne by Dr. Laidner 1836

A Circular published in Calcutta 1835

A Petition to Parliament (signatures, 7,632) 1836

A Memorial to the India Board 1 836

A letter to Lord William Bentinck. 1836

A reply of the Bengal Committee to M-ijor Head, Chairman

of the Provincial Committee 1836

In all 124 octavo pages of letterpress. Will it be believed that Waghorn's name or services are not even alluded to ? The Calcutta pilot — a prophet, if you will — had no honour in his own country, though his bust now greets the stranger as he enters the Suez Canal. And yet before 1836 he had done some things in this overland business to make him a marked man.  He was not unknown in Calcutta; he had been in the pilot
service of that city from 1819 to 1824, and for two and a half years had command of the Matchless cutter, of Sir John Hayes' squadron, and had become early imbued with an interest in steam communication with England.
 It was in Calcutta at a public meeting in 1828 that Commodore Hayes gave his warmest support to him, and it was its Steam Committee in 1828 which accredited him to persons of official standing in Madras, Ceylon  Mauritius, the Cape, and St. Helena.

                                                          WAGHORN.

He surely had a title to be heard on the question. I presume it was well enough known in October, 1836, that
Lord Ellenborough, the President of the Board of Control (October, 1829), had sent for Waghorn to carry important dispatches to Sir John Malcolm and demonstrate the practica- bility of Eed Sea navigation. We all know how he performed that journey, how he darted across a continent without railways to Trieste, from Trieste to Alexandria in a sailing craft, to Rosetta on donkeys, to Cairo on a Nile boat, to Suez on camel
back, to Cosseir in an open native boat, and by the same conveyance to Jeddah, a distance of 660 miles from Suez.
Many of us can follow him on donkey and dahabiah, and on camel back, but for that voyage in an open boat on the Red Sea we would require Burckhardt, or Burton, or Frere to delineate its miseries. He arrived in the Company's cruiser on March 21st, in four months twenty-one days from London. Such was Red Sea navigation before steam was taken out of the tea-kettle. He had already lectured on the subject in all
the leading cities of India and England. It is honestly averred that he lived for three entire years with the Arab tribes between Cairo and Suez. Think of that, you who live at home at ease, and all to save you and your kith and kin from the plunder and cut-throats of the desert.

Government and the Company were not generous with Waghorn. They gave him a pension of £200 a year, I
understand, in 1848 (he died in 1850), which was immediately mortgaged by his creditors.* They could scarcely be expected to pay his outlay on dhuramsalas, dahabiahs and never-ending backsheesh. I dare say if they had known in 1848 what we know now, they would have paid his debts a dozen times over,
which would have been cheap at the money. What we complain of was their hide-bound prejudices in their postal system, as if it was immaculate, and their retention of dirty steamers, such as the Berenice and Zendbia. Did not a P. and 0. steamer make Calcutta from Suez in 1843 ?

How he should have been ignored by Calcutta in 1836 we * A sister who had all along cheered him in his labours survived him til 1883. She died in a London workhouse   can only explain by the fact that the Company and the Post Office, the Gog and Magog of these early times, hated Waghorn and 'every man who dared to interfere with their established custom or routine, and it was the fashion to do so, tliough for
five years (1832 to 1837) he had the absolute control of the Overland Mails in his hands. One of the strangest things was how the truth gradually dawned upon Waghorn. At first he firmly believed in the Cape route and lectured upon it in Calcutta, where he engaged some of the foremost men there to assist him in making his views public to the communities of Madras, Ceylon, Mauritius, and the Cape. But truth travels slowly. He that believeth shall not make haste. I suppose his own passage down the Ked Sea in 1829 led up to his
conversion, and Captain Wilson's two voyages in the Hugh Lindsay from Bombay to Suez completed it.

Henceforth nothing could part him from the Red Sea route, and he threw all the energy and perseverance with which he was so largely endowed into the work of its accomplishment. Waghorn is one of the martyrs of science. Galileo on bended knees and Waghorn knocking at the door of the India House are two pictures that will endure to the last syllable of recorded time. Waghorn holds the key of the Overland route, and though he never saw the Suez Canal, he certainly saw the man who made it ; and Lesseps has left on record undying words (Nov. 1883) that it was to Waghorn alone that he was indebted for the great idea.

Yes, you may well look at this man, and go back to Spenser in the days of Drake and Raleigh for his portrait.

"A silly man in simple weeds forworne
And soil'd with dust to the long drieii way;
His sandales were with toilsome travail tornc,
And face all tann'd with scorching sunny ray,
As he had travell'd many a summer day
Through boyling sands of Arabic and Ynd."

Pilot of Calcutta and the Hooghly in the first place, and then pilot of the whole Eastern world of commerce,

Waghorn died in poverty at Chatham (1850) in the fiftieth year of
his age ;
 Taylor was murdered in Mesopotamia in 1830 ;

Wilson, unrewarded, died in 1875, and I rather think that

                                      WAGHORN'.

Capt. Johnston, E.N"., of the Enterprise, ended his days as English Postmaster in Alexandria. He died May 5th, 1851.*

"Give him a little earth for chari'y."

Such was the fate of the pioneers of the Red Sea and Over- land steam communication.

Some of the following quotations of 1837 are gropings in the dark, but represent the highest wisdom, or what was considered such at the period, on the all-engrossing theme : —

" A steamship does good duty if she works half her time."

" A steamer against the monsoon would tack like a sailing
vessel."

" Passages from Socotra to Bombay to be made under sail
only."

"Abundance of good steam coal is obtained in America,
which would doubtless be taken as ballast by American
vessels."

" Cairo to Suez. The road is hard and smooth ; there is no
need of a railroad."

"It might be found also that correspondence might be forwarded to Great Britain from Egypt with greater despatch by landing it at Marseilles and sending it by land to Calais."
So it was.

"The number of passengers and despatches to and from Bombay being less in a considerable proportion than the other ports of India." This seems to have been so in 1836.
" In seasons when the monsoon is most violent the Bombay
steamer might meet at the head of the Maldives."

" The course from Bombay to the Maldives would be quite
practicable, as well as the course from the Maldives to Socotra."

" If Bombay is decided on, it would be more convenient to land the passengers and parcels from India for Great Britain at Penzance or even the Scilly Islands than those of Great Britain for all India at Bombay." — Letter from Bengal Committee to Provincial Committee, Dec. 26th, 1836.

James Henry Johnsto.stinction belongs to the Nubia, Captain Wilkinson,
which left Bombay about March 9th, 1870. My fellow- passenger was the late Andrew Hay, Sheriff of Bombay (1868). We had a sickly voyage up the lied Sea and several deaths took place. The heat was blazing. Steaming slowly, we seemed to be cutting our way through a sea as smooth as plate glass.
Several times the ship was turned round to create a draught, for there was not a breath of wind, and we were almost suffocated. We buried two men one morning at 6 a.m. By a mischance the bodies were not unfastened from the grating, so at the last moment, when Wilkinson read from the Burial Service, " we commit the bodies of our dear brothers to the deep," down went the grating with the two bodies on it, nearly carrying the two quartermasters away with it. But Wilkinson did not flinch or falter ; he continued reading the Burial Service to the end, when, lo and behold ! some miles away the grating was seen floating on the glassy sea, with the two bodies on it, and the British flag atop.
" Stop her ! " was thundered out, a boat was lowered, the bodies released, and the recovered paraphernalia brought on board.
The Cathay was at Suez, and the Commander, if still to the fore, may have forgotten the circumstance, which I remember very well, that he entertained us hospitably on board his ship, with the addition of the Agent and English Consul for many years, the well-known Mr. West. The toast was drunk : " May you never touch the bottom." Great Scott ! I could see that it was an anxious moment when we entered the Canal. West
accompanied us, told us he had often ridden over the ground we were sailing over ; and Wilkinson — care sat on his manly brow — muttered something about skippers taking lessons in Dutch navigation.

It was a new experience for the lascars, trudging along the muddy banks with the hawsers wherewith to tie us up for the night. I am not quite sure that they had not to drive in the

                                      THE FIRST P. AND O. THROUGH THE CANAL.

piles with which to fasten us while the sun descended and darkness covered the land of E^ypt. I dare say Wilkinson would have preferred running with bare poles before the South- West Monsoon, or being tossed like a bucket in the white squall of the Mediterranean, That night all was gloom. Not as now, when the electric light clears up a way in the silence and blackness of midnight, a veritable pillar of fire for many an exodus
to many a land of promise, changing these mud heaps on either side — the ugliest things in creation — into a weird phantasmagoria, flashing, dazzling to the eye, a wondrous dream, not
of the mingling of two seas, but —

''Twenty seas if all their sands were peirl."

I need not add that the Nulla s trip through the Canal was
a complete success. This trip was the beginning of a new era,
and I ventured to tell the story to onewlio was much interested
in it. " But what did your fellow passengers think of the Canal ? "
said Lesseps a few months after this. I answered that one of
them said it was the greatest work of utility that had been
made since the creation of the world, adding that an American
guessed he would not call it a great work until it paid. " It will
pay," said the Baron quietly, which was also Beaconsfield's
opinion, and which time has amply justified.

The date of this conversation was, I think, in July, 1870, and
the place was " The Wick," Eichmond, a bowshot from the " Star
and Garter," which everybody knows. There were no houses
between them in those days, and its garden ran down to the
Thames. This house had a celebrated history. It was once given
by the King to Sir Joshua Reynolds, and here Dr. Johnson and
Burke also, as I suppose, came to dine or sup. Neither of them
predicted the Suez Canal, nor dreamed that in the room where
they sat would be congregated a hundred men and women to do
honour to the maker of it. There they were, however, soldiers,
statesmen, artists, P. and' 0. directors, some old Egyptians, with a
sprinkling of undistinguished others. The place was worthy of
the occasion, and the Master of Ceremonies did it every honour.
He had been deputed by Lloyds as their representative at the
opening of the Canal, was an early friend of Lesseps, when
tliey wandered imknown, and bivouacked on scanty fare under

tamarisk or acacia in those days when Mohammed Ali, of vener-
able yeard, rode out on a white ass arid administered justice coram
populo in Okella or Bazaar. But why do we hesitate ? The
name of Alexander Tod was widely known by a generation of
Anglo-Indians at his half-way house in Alexandria. Long ere
he became a merchant prince his hospitality was boundless, and
flowed in a continuous stream.

Missionary, manager, explorer, diplomat, and subaltern, Sir
James Outram, Frere, or Lord Dufferin, were all made happy.
If the wheels on the Overland Eoute at first drove heavily, he
was a pioneer who smoothed the path and cheered the spirits of
the passing traveller. George Gliddon, American Consul, his
father-in-law, was Waghorn's representative in Egypt.

Brevity is the soul of wit and of wisdom also, and Johnson
himself would have lauded that speech of four words, in which
the master of the household toasted his ancient and honoured
friend — " genius and energy personified." I am sure Lesseps
never spent a happier day, not even in the Guildhall, when
he received the freedom of the City. There he was with his
young wife, in the blush of early womanhood. The Empress
of the French, when she was still the betrothed, at the Canal
inauguration paid her marked attention. " The last time I
saw you, you were in tears," said one to her who had not seen
her since that great day. He was laughing all the time. It
was too true. The Empress had embraced her, and overcome
by this act of love and condescension she had burst into a
flood of tears.

The host was a Scotsman, and as everybody nowadays,
when he arrives at distinction, is anxious to show he has a drop
of Scotch blood in his veins, Lesseps in his reply to the toast of
his health on this memorable occasion spoke in French nearly
as follows : — " I too have some claims to be regarded as a
Scotsman. If you read the story of the building of St. Giles's
Cathedral in Edinburgh you will see that its architect was
Le Sept. I claim to be a descendant of him." There was no
mention of his ancestor in the Scots Guard of Paris in this
speech.

Alexander Tod, full of years and honour, died at Walmer in
1893; his friend Lesseps in 1894 disappeared in a cloud, from

which his name and fame are destined to emerge.* William
Paterson founded the Bank of England, and the Darien
scheme is forgotten, and Panama will gradually subside into
the same oblivion and be swallowed up in the immortal
memory of Lesseps as the maker of the Suez Canal.

The earliest English birth notice on Malabar Hill &Death 1841

Rose Coghlan, from World's Beauties, Series 1 (N26) for Allen & Ginter Cigarettes

Rose Coghlan, from World's Beauties, Series 1 (N26) for Allen & Ginter...

Trade cards from "World's Beauties," Series 1 (N26)


" On November 12th, 1841, at Malabar Hill, the lady of W. M. Coghlan,
Bii^ade-Major of Artillery, of a son."

THE GOOD OLD DAYS IN BOMBAY.

Early History of Malabar in Detail ...

The earliest English birth notice on Malabar Hill at hand is
the following : —

" On November 12th, 1841, at Malabar Hill, the lady of W. M. Coghlan,
Bii^ade-Major of Artillery, of a son."

Death was busy in 1844 with the merchants of Bombay,
and had shorn them of some of their brightest ornaments. He
is a tyrant, as we may say in our haste, who has no respect for
overland routes or banking enterprise.

John Skinner, on March 23rd, as we have seen, led the way
into the silent land, and my record hath it that Malcomson,
partner of Forbes and Co., died the very same day at Dliulia, in
Khandeish. He seems to have been a most lovable man, of
great scientific acquirements ; for both Darwin and Hugh
Miller lamented his early decease and paid a passing tribute to
his genius. His full name was Dr. John Grant Malcomson.
He was one of the founders of the Free Church in this city,
which in 1843 enlisted such bright and youthful spirits as
himself, William Graham, David M'CuUoch, and Thomas
Lancaster.

On November 22nd, 1844, at Eegent's Park, London, died
James Eitchie, founder of llitchie, Steuart and Co. in 1818.
William Church, of Brownrigg and Co., left Bombay in Septem-
ber, and, shortly after his return home, died on December 18th ;
Miller, of Campbell, Miller and Co., died about the same time at
the Cape on his way home; and George S. King, of G. S. King
and Co., was cut off on his return voyage to India by steamer

SOME MERCHANTS OF 1845,Where the Merchants Lived, BOMBAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-Established September 22nd, 1836, Parsee Houses.


Parsee Houses.

It may serve to illustrate the position of the mercantile
world of 1845 in Bombay if we add a list of the Parsee leading
firms which were carrying on business at the advent of Exchange
Banking. The names of some of their old-world places of
business enhance the interest of the note, and while the reader
will recognise the " forbears " of some of our honoured magnates,
there are others which have disappeared from this chequered
web of history.

Bomanjee and Ardaseer Hormusjee, Old Theatre.

Byramjee Jeejeebhoy, Rampart Row.




Cursetlee Ardaseer Dady, Borah Bazaar Street.

Cursetjee Covvasjee Sous and Co., Grant Buildings, Colaba.

Dadabhoy and Muncherjee Pestonjee, Borah Bazaar Street.

Dadabhoy Rustomjee Banajee, Rampart Row.

Framjee Covvasjee, Apollo Street

.

Sir Jamsetjee Jeejebhoy Sons and Co., Gunbow Street.


File:Residence of Jejeebhoy.jpg
Jeejeebhoy Dadabhoy Sons and Co., Rampart Row.

Mauackjee Nusscrwanjee Petit.

Muncherjee and Pestonjee Framjee Cama, Old Theatre.

Nusserwanjee Bomanjee Mody, Old Theatre.

Nowrojee Ardaseer Davur, Old Theatre.

Ruttoujee Edusjee Bottlewalla, Gunbow Street.

Jamsetjee Furdonjee Paruck, Church Gate Street.






Manackjee Limjee Cowasjce.

By way of explanation we only now add that on the com-
pletion of Grant Buildings :-




there was a considerable migration of native and half a dozen English houses of business to it (1844), as it was the belief then that it would eventually become the mercantile centre.

The site of the Old Theatre was Hormusjee's block in the Elphinstone Circle, :-



next to the Chartered Bank, and Gunbow Street is adjacent and has got an ornamental fountain near it.


SOME MEECHANTS OF 1845 AND THEIR METHODS OF BUSINESS.

Bombay Stock Exchange c 1864

BOMBAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.

Established September 22nd, 1836.

List ok Members, December 15th, 1845.

John Smith, Esq., Chairman.

W. S. Grey, Esq., Deputy Chairman.

Managing Committee in Office till August, 1846.
The Chairman, ex officio. The Deputy Chairman, ex officio.

Members :
L. A. Wallace, Esq.
J. Stuait, Esq.
S. D. Murray, E?q.
W. Graham, Esq.
J. PHrsons, ESq.
A. Cassels, Esq.
W. S. Brown, Esq.
Curse tjee Cowasjei', Esq.
Ardaseer Cursetjee, Esq.
Dhackjee Dadajee, Esq.
Messrs. Ritchie, Steuart and Co., Treasurers.
T. J. A. Scoit, Secretary.
Firms composing the Chamber.
Messrs. Ritchie, Steuart & Co.
„ William Nicol & Co.
„ Dirom Hunter & Co.
„ Brownrigo; & Co.
„ W. & T. Edmond & Co.
„ Martin Murray & Co.
„ Macvicar, Burn & Co.
„ Ewart, Lyon & Co.
„ HiCTgii.son &; Cardwell
„ Frith &; Co.
„ Grey &; Co.
„ Campbell, Miller & Co.
„ Wm. & Alexander Graham &;Co.
„ Campbell, Dallas & Co.
„ G. S. King & Co.
Messrs. Leckie & Co.
Cresswell, Rawson & Co.
Lyons, Livingstone & Co.
■W. Elsam &aCo.
Henry, Wooler & Co.
Peel, Cassels & Co.

Huschke, Wattenbach & Co.

Cursetjee Ardaseer & Co.

Cursctjee Cowasjee & Co.

Dadabhoy & M. Pestonjee.

JeejeeVihoy Dadabhoy Sons
&Co.

Framjee Cowasjee, Esq,
Dadabhoy Rustomjee, Esq.
Juggannath Sunkersett, Esq.
Dady Rustomjee, Et-q.



John Smith had accompanied Dr. Wilson (1843-44) in his tour through Egypt and Syria. Andrew Cassels and William Graham, M.P., became members of the Indian Council in London.Several of the native members have already been noticed. In 1842 Dhackjee Dadajee's house was the object of suspicions.
is place was overhauled, and though fourteen lakhs of theGaekwar's were discovered, the suspicions were altogetherUnfounded.

The Chamber of Commerce was established under the auspices of Sir Robert Grant.He is known to some people as the writer of some of our best hymns, to others as having given his assistance to the removal of the civil disabilities of the Jews, to others as having helped to make "the main drain," and to all petitioners in these olden days as one of the most dilatory of men, insomuch that when applications went in to Parell, it was never known when a reply would come out, and it was then Parell was nicknamed " Chancery."



Slow but sure, whenever he saw that his course was clear, in such great enterprises as the Bank of Bombay, the Over- land Route, or the Chamber of Commerce, it was then that he threw into the scale the weight of his great authority.

The Tanna and Colaba Causeways are his monuments, besides hundreds of miles of good roads between this and Sholapore. am under the impression that the Chamber voted a marble cenotaph to his memory in the Byclla Church or elsewhere, and he well deserved it, for a better man never filled the Governor's chair.

Here then is the Commercial Body of Bombay as it stood about 1845.
It is noticeable that neither Forbes, nor Remington, nor Sassoon had as yet joined the Chamber for
reasons unknown to us. The reason for their not joining inbanking enterprise at the first is obvious enough, and one can sympathise with their caution.

No doubt the privileges of " The Four Houses," as they were called — Forbes, Remington,
Leckie, and Shotton — were abolished by the charter of 1834, hen all Indian firms without exception were put upon the same level,

but it is a curious fact that so late as 1841, when a charter was applied for, the " Bank of Asia," a big, ill-starred institution, of which some of the capital was paid up, the East India Company gave as one of their reasons for refusing it that the bank would come into collision with houses dealing in European exchange.
Be that as it may, we need not say that, at the time of which we write, Robert Wigram Crawford, of
Remington and Co., was one of the most conspicuous men in Bombay (he resided here from 1833 to 18 7), and the admiration enlisted by him here was fully justified afterwards by the brilliant career which awaited him in London, and though his name is not in this list, he appears in 1845 as a Director of the Bank of Bombay, the other two houses and his own contributing in subsequent years a most influential quota to the Board of this
long well-managed institution.

We have omitted among those who did not join, the name of Edward Bates, without which any list of the merchants of Bombay in 1845 would be incomplete.
Only three or four firms are now (1895) in existence under the same style and designation. Nor is this at all wonderful, for I dare say the same observation for the same period would hold good in regard to the ommercial history of Melbourne, New York, or London.

But we are not here to moralise, for there are many firms in India, the family relations of which have descended to the present generation, and whose business is carried on by scions of those who were masters of the field, or were becoming so fifty years ago.
If you wish continuity and instances of how names perpetuate themselves you must go to Government and the men who do its business, and you will find that the most exalted of our day,
Mansfield, Bird wood, and Willoughby, are the names of soldiers and civilians of this Presidency fifty years ago —

names now "familiar in our mouths as household words," and which constitute a pleasing link between the present time and the past . At this period the English houses were their own bankers and brokers. The exporters generally made as many bills as the importers required, and the business was done direct without the intervention of a broker
. The first exchange broker in Bombay was Nelson Howard.

When he came brokerage on bills was a half per cent. But he is not due yet for a year or two. The modus operandi of Exchange. As we have indicated, exchange business was carried through by the import houses buying from the export ones , and, generally speaking, as the balance was in favour of India,

The eminent firm of Sir Edward Bates & Co. was closed in Bombay in1898.was sufficient ; when any hiatus presented itself the bills drawno in London on the

Indian Treasuries were available — what we now call Council Bills, of which the East India Company
had been issuing at fitful times and prices about two millions sterling annually for ten years up to 1843.

Any balance unadjusted by bills was left to the ultimate ratio of bullion, which was pitched about between Bombay and London according to the exigencies of trade.

Bombay exports to all places of the known world in 1843-44 ad valorem were Ks. 8,29,15,366 ; imports for the same period Rs. 9,25,46,220.

For ten years the shipments of silver from London to all parts of India annually averaged about 160 lakhs. This may satisfy the curious reader as to the bulk and extent of the Bombay trade fifty years ago, and will enable him to compare such items as exports, imports, bullion, and Council Bills with the gigantic proportions they have now assumed.

The houses of fifty years ago advertised in' the newspapers when they had bills for sale, and from the replies took their cue as to their disposal. Forbes and Remington do not appear much in this way. The following are a few advertisements culled at random : —

" Messrs. Prinsep and Co., Agents of Messrs. Palmer and Co., Calcutta,
will draw upon Messrs. Cockerell, Trail and Co., 6 mos. at Is. 9Jrf. until
further notice. — Bombny, 10th Dec, 1824."

" Fiir sale at the office of William Nicol and Co , Bank of England notes
for £50, £20, £10, and £5 at Rs. 11 per £1."

And again,

" Bills on London,
Boyal Bank of Scotland, on Thomas Coutts imd Co., London, at 30 days'
sight, at Is. 10c?. at Ritchie, Steuart and Co., Irf34, Dec. 6."

"McGregor, Brownrisg and Co. offer their 30 days' sight bills on
Sir Charles Cockerell, Barotiet, at 2s., 1837, Jan. 3."

" Bills on Freilerick Huth and Co. at 60 days' siglit, and in sots to suit
the convenience. Edmond, Bibby and Co., 1^37, Dec. 9."

The business of dealing in English Exchange was not
confined to English Houses. Here are two advertisements : —

" 1828, Aug. 13, £5,000 6 months' Bills en a Letter of Credit from a
house in London of the first respectability offered at Is. 9i(?."

Jehantiier and Nowrojee N'usserwanjee.

1829, Feb. 4, Bills on London, Jehangier and Mowrojee Nusserwanjee
have received from Calcutta a sum in Bills of Exchange on London at six
months which they will dispone of."
-And again,

Jehangier Nusserwanjee Wadia on Baring Brothers six months for sale,
1837, J an. 17."

These two names as we shall see have more than a passing interest for us in 1895. They belong to the Wadia family, and were the names of brothers in business as private bankers, and for some time financial brokers to William Nicol and Co. (1824 to 1842). Nowrojee died in 1827;
Jehangier died in 1849. Nowrojee left one son, Manockji, who was married to the only daughter of
Jehangier. That daughter, widow of Manockji (who died in 1837), still lives among us, venerable and venerated — eighty- three years of age — a veritable lady —

Motlihai — renowned wherever Bombay is spoken of for her deeds of charity and beneficence. Honour to whom honour is due.
" She has a tear for pity and a hand open as day for melting charity."'

Most people imagine that the ancient merchant or private banker of Bombay before the advent of Joint Stock Banks was not troubled much with the exchange question. This is a great fallacy. Between 1817 and 1823 exchange fell from 2s. M. to Is. 8^c?., or over 30 per cent.
Dear money in these years was caused by the army of the Dekhan, which consumed an immense
sum. This was part of the price we paid for our acquisitions.

Again in 1837,

on May 9th, exchange touched 2s. O^d., and on June 15th, or six weeks thereafter, it was Is. M. I think
this beats the record of the last thirty yeais (1865-95) within a similar space of time. The mercantile circulars call the fall 20 per cent., and I am not going to quarrel with their arithmetic.Bad was the best of it, except for the

" Bears,"

if such existed in these prehistoric times, and quite sufficient to turn men's hair gray in a single night. The Chamber had not been in existence for half a dozen years when they were confronted with the exchange question, and the way in which it was affected by the issue of what we call Council Bills to defray the
home charges. So far as any body of men can fix the rate of Died May 25th, 1897 (one of her two sons, Nusserwanjee, died three weeks before her), leaving J^. M. Wadia, Esq., C.I.E., her remaining son, to
inherit her great fortune.


exchange,

the East India Company had that power in the disposal of their drafts on India in London and their purchase of bills in India, and the Chamber justly com- plains that in London, by abrupt leaps and bounds of a
halfpenny and even a penny at a time, they raised the rate from Is. llc^. in March, 1842, to 2s. l^d. in April the same year, being a fluctuation of 10 per cent.

On the 30th January, 1843,
the Chamber sent a memorial to the Board of Control complaining of the evils and grievances to which trade was subjected by the extraordinary fluctuations and uncertainty in the rate of exchange, caused by the mode in which the Court of Directors at present provide themselves with the funds required for the home charges, and pray that the exchange operations between the two countries may be placed on a sound and proper footing, and be conducted on some fixed, just, and well- understood principles. I do not think the Company in Bombay sold many bills on London.Men took home their piles in produce, if they managed to escape the clutches of Augria — often in diamonds.


We are sorry to say anything against this fine old Company.They actually, in 1821, went so far out of their way as to promise to remit the Robert Burns statue fund from Bombay at 2s. Sd. I rather, however, fancy that when the bill was obtained the rate in the open market was 2s. 3d.

No doubt the merchant had compensation in the profit that accrued between the selling and buying rate of bills, and the rates which follow will afford a more pleasant perusal than the shadowy differences of recent times.

Buying Rate.

182fi, July 1 2.S-. Id. to 2s. 2d.

1828, Jan. 1 Is. llt^.

1835, Aug. 1 2s.

1836, Jnn. 23 2s.

„ Dec. 31 2s. Id.

1837, Aug. 19, 30 dys' st., Is. 9K
1839, May 28, 6 mos,, 2s. Ifrf.

The flow of gold and silver into India had not been continuous, and it is observed in 1834, " For the last fifteen years there has been a constant exportation of bullion from India to england going on." The tide is now turned " and exportation ceased, so we may expect a return of the precious metals."

It is now looked upon as a fable that the Bank of Scotland's fine building in Edinburgh was defrayed from these, and there was a feeling of disappointment, when the old Bank of Bombay was wound up, that there was so small an asset from this con- tingency. The period of that Bank was pacific and unlike the old times before it. There was a heavy death-roll all through the eighteenth and the first quarter of the nineteenth century. We do not set great store on these windfalls as an item in the balance sheet of private or public banking, but M'Cluer (1795), the Master Mason, whose funds our Administrator- General may know about, and for which nobody can substantiate a claim, bespeaks an increment which may have been somewhat
substantial. ( Vide article Masonic Legacy.)

Where the Merchants Lived.

Most of them before this time used to live at Mazagon and the Fort. Now they were scattered over the island — John Smith at Love Grove, James Wright at the Dock, Alexr. Hadden at the Mount, Edward Bates at Chinchpoogly (also Sir Henry Eoper, Chief Justice), Robert Strong, Edward Lyon, and Thomas Cardwell at Breach Candy. :-



Two young men, shortly thereafter, David Watson and A. J. Hunter (one became Sheriff and the other Member of Council), had their house in Grant's Buildings, which were new, and a favourite
place in those days.


There was a rush to Malabar Hill,

and
the ground could not be cleared fast enough, for as soon as plots were laid out and houses available, tenants were ready. Here are the upper ten, or avant couriers, in 1845 of all who have since made this pleasant place their habitation

:—
Andrew Cassels, Robert Wigram Crawford, Thomas Lan- caster, Vincent Ashfield King, John Parsons, Alexander Eemington, Archibald Smart, William Scott, J. E. Maclachlan, Mr. Molyneux, to which may be added two or three men of the legal profession

Saturday, February 21, 2009

THE WILD BEASTS OF BOMBAY. /TIGER AT MAHIM,HYENA AT BYCULLA,TIGER AT ESPLANADE,TIGER AT MAZGAON,HYENA AT MALABAR HILL,TIGER AT GOWALIA TANK

MALABAR HILL FOREST THE WILD BEASTS OF BOMBAY. 1783. — The Governor and most of the gentlemen of Bombay go annually on a party of pleasure to Salsette" to hunt the wild boar and royal tiger, both of which we found here in great plenty. — Hector Macneill.

1806, December 17th. — Two gentlemen at 7 a.m. riding towards the bungalows of General Macpherson on the Island of Salsette, near the village of Coorla, two tigers came out of the jungle as if ready to spring, crouched, and were observed to betake themselves to the jungles and hills of Powee, fifty yards in front of the horses.

And in this connection two persons on November 4th were carried off by two tigers from a native village nearly opposite to Powee, near the high road leading from Sion to Tanna.

The natives believe the tigers are human beings, and have gold rings in their ears and noses. One native's body they had sucked all the blood out of it, otherwise not eaten. They took away a herdsman driving his fl^ck. 1819,

— There were in all only three deaths recorded in India of Europeans from snake-bites in the years 1817, 1818 and 1819. 1820, December 23rd.

— A large lion killed within eight coss from Ahmedabad. 1822, February 9th.

— A tiger on Malabar Hill came down, quenched his thirst at Gowalla Tank, and ran off over the hill between the Hermitage and Prospect Lodge. Prints of its feet were distinctly visible this morning. 1828.

— At Colaba Ferry a huge shark was observed in proximity to some bathers. 1830, January 13th.

 — A large hyena is prowling about Malabar Hill on the western side between Mr. Nicol's residence and Vaucluse, " as good sport as a Mazagon tiger."

— Bombay Gazette. 1839, June 25th. — Lieutenant Montague, at Colaba, returning from mess, put his foot in a hole, received a slight wound which in twenty-five minutes carried him off. Some jurors thought it was from the bite of a serpent.

1841, September 15 th. — A man bitten by a snake on the Esplanade.

1849. — A finback whale driven on shore at Colaba, 60 feet long, 30 to 40 feet round the thickest part. All along the road from the Fort to Colaba was a perfect fair. . The stench was felt from the town side of the causeway from where it lay at the back of Colaba Church. Jawbone taken away. — Gentleman s Gazette. 1850, Oct. 9th.

— A tiger at Bandoop leaped upon the mail- cart and upset it, and the gliarry-wallah was little injured. I saw jackals several times in the gardens of the Colaba Observa- tory in 1844.

— Dr. Buist. On tins Mr. Charles Chambers, F.K.S., observes (1893) : " I found a jackal in my bedroom in the Colaba Observatory about fifteen years ago." A jackal was killed in the new High Court Buildings shortly after they were finished. 1858, March 3rd

.— Some officers of the P. and 0. steamer Aden observed a tiger swimming from Mainland to Mazagon. A boat was lowered and the crew armed with ship's muskets. When they came up to it the brute was boarding a buggalow, and was being kept off by the lascars by handspikes. It was shot through the head by six balls. Weight, 353 lbs. Length to tip of tail, 8 ft. 9 ins. 1858, May 26th.

— A young Portuguese this day shot a tiger at Mahim, and on the 27th inst. brought the carcass to the Chief Magistrate for the reward,

1859. — To-day Mr. Forjett with a fowling-piece shot a tiger within a few hundred yards of the fashionable drive on the Esplanade, and on the beach of Back Bay near Sonapore. Mr. Forjett promised the hide to Dr. Birdwood for the Museum. —Bombay Gazette.

Feb. 6th. — On this day, Sunday evening, the wife of Mr. Pratt, uncovenanted assistant in the General Department Secre- tariat, walking along with her husband in the fields adjoining their residence at Mahim, trod on a snake and died two hours afterwards.

— Bombay Gazette. Feb. 15th. — ■A tiger was seen sloping about the nooks of Kalpadavie, but disappeared.

Nov. 12th. — Dr. Turner, P. and 0. service, at his residence, Chinchpoogly, was bitten by a venomous snake on the calf of the leg. His leg swelled to an immense size. A friend of his made an incision, sucked the wound, and he is now recovering.

Kov. 16th. — A cobra, 4 ft. in length, killed in Secretariat compound, Apollo Street. 1860,

Oct. 31st. — On Sunday a snake was seen amusing itself round one of the pillars in St. John's Church, Colaba, a few yards from the reading-desk, and not long ago a cobra was found in the organ. — Times and Standard.

Dec. 5 th. — A hyena shot while devouring a bullock not far from the Byculla Club House. 1861,

Bombay Photo Images[ Mumbai]: BOMBAY BYCULLA CLUB AND OLDER CLUBS, 1822,
BOMBAY BYCULLA CLUB

Nov. 26th. — Hyenas quite common at night, prowling about the Byculla Flats. 1863,

Jan. 25th.— Tiger at Mahim, near railway station. Two natives killed by it. Shot.

Flora and fauna: (left to right) A painting shows a tiger entering a village; a painting of a Pink-headed Duck, a bird that was common in Mumbai in the 1920s; and a painting by J.P. Irani. Photograph

Flora and fauna: (left to right) A painting shows a tiger entering a village; a painting of a Pink-headed Duck, a bird that was common in Mumbai in the 1920s; and a painting by J.P. Irani. Photograph

A tiger on Malabar Hill

A tiger on Malabar Hill

A large tiger was shot in the vicinity of the Vehar Lake, Salsette on Tuesday, January 22, 1929.

The animal was killed by Mr. J.J. Sutari, to whom I am indebted for the following particulars. Mr. Sutari and a party of friends were out after the usual type of game the Salsette jungles provide, which is mainly wild boar. They took up their positions in the vicinity of the south end of the lake shortly after sunset and waited for something to turn up. Towards 10 p.m. Mr. Sutari’s attention was aroused by the sounds of some animal approaching. One can well imagine his astonishment when a tiger walked out of the shadows into the moonlight. The tiger came steadily on, when at a distance of 12 yards, Sutari fired his 12-bore loaded with ball and dropped the animal in his tracks. The tiger in question, a straggler from the main land, probably crossed over by swimming the Thana Creek. An animal doing so would find immediate shelter in the jungles which cover the hilly portions of Salsette.

Flora and fauna: (left to right) A painting shows a tiger entering a village; a painting of a Pink-headed Duck, a bird that was common in Mumbai in the 1920s; and a painting by J.P. Irani. Photographs courtesy Bombay Natural History Society

Tigers appear to have been fairly plentiful in Salsette at the end of the eighteenth century. Hector MacNeil (Archaelogia, vol. vii, 1873) tells us that in 1761 “the Governor and most of the gentlemen of Bombay used to go annually on a pleasure party to Salsette to hunt Wild Boar and Royal Tiger both of which were found there in great plenty." Records of the occurrence of tiger in these islands during the nineteenth century are few and far between.

In 1806, two tigers were seen near General Macpherson’s bungalow at Kurla, while a few days previously two persons were carried off from a village a little further north, it is presumed by the same animals.

On February 9, 1822, a tiger on Malabar Hill came down and quenched its thirst at Gowalia Tank and ran off up the hill between the Hermitage and Prospect Lodge. The imprint of its feet were clearly visible the next morning (Bombay Courrier, February 10, 1822).

The Bombay Courrier of December 1829 records the sudden appearance of a tiger at Mazagon, the animal apparently swam across the harbour and landed near the ruined Mazagon fort. It was driven into the compound of Mr. Henshaw’s bungalow where it was eventually shot by the guard of the Dockyard and several Arabs. It measured 8’ 8".

On March 2, 1858, the crew of the steamer Aden killed a large tiger which was swimming across to Mazagon from the opposite shore. The animal attempted to board a small boat and was kept off with hand pikes by the lascars. It was eventually dispatched with “six balls through its head". (Bombay Times, March 6, 1858).

In May of the same year a tiger was killed in Mahim woods by a young Portuguese, while on January 26, 1863, another tiger was killed at Mahim after mauling a Parsi cart-owner and committing other damage. (Bombay Times, January 27, 1863).

James Douglas (Bombay and Western India) writing about tigers in Salsette gives an amusing narrative of a “traveller (was it Silk Buckingham?) in Salsette who was suddenly surprised by his palkee being dropped and the coolies bolting. The palkee was closed, and he soon felt outside the Jhilmils something of a fee-faw-fum character. Stripes was wide awake and the coolies, up a tree, were wide awake also. He didn’t sleep much that night I tell you."

In 1907, a tiger was shot at Pir Pau, Trombay, near Sandow Castle by Mr. Mullan of the Bombay Port Trust. This with the one cited above are the most recent records.

Living Jewels of Indian Jungle, published by BNHS, 204 pages, Rs1,600. The pre-publication price of the book, to be ordered from BNHS directly by 12 September, is Rs1,000. For details, call 022-22821811.

Write to lounge@livemint.com

THE BLACK DEATH.,or Bubonic plague OF 1898 BOMBAY














THE BLACK DEATH,or Bubonic plague

On August 15th, 1348, which means 25th by our calendar, a
strange disease appeared at Bristol. The harvest of that year
could not be gathered for rain, and, while it lay rotting in the
fields, people were wondering how they would subsist during
the coming winter. It looked as if half the population would
not be able to find bread. It never occurred to anyone that in
a few months half the population would cease to exist. At
first people were disposed to laugh at the new importation,
and they thought little of it ; but by and bye, when a thousand
or two fell before it, unconcern gave way to the deepest anxiety
or the wildest terror. People fled from it as from a destroying
angel. The mysterious visitor which had reached our shores
was the most mortal of all epidemics, and was no other than
the black death, or Bubonic plague of the Ptolemies and of
Justinian, and carried the mind back to the emerods and rats
of Gaza and Askelon with the Ark, and the " oxen lowing as
they went " on their way to Kirjath-jearim.

The disease had
never been known in England before it appeared in Bristol in
1348, and it deserves to be noted that it remained domesticated
on the soil of England, with slight intermissions, for three
hundred years, and never left our shores until it finally took its
departure in 1666, since which date, let us thank God, it has
never returned.
It reached London on November 1st, 1348 ; but the news
of its approach by ships from the Levant and from across the
Channel had long preceded it. As the mighty wave rolled
from reahn to realm, the tidings came like the portents of a
thunderstorm. There had been mutterings from the Caspian,
the Bosphorus, and the Adriatic. Cairo, Damascus, and
Byzantium were merely the milestones of its onward journey.

Boccaccio limned it at Florence; Petrarch spoke of it as a
world's wonder ; and Laura died of it at Avignon.

It seemed to have come to a head in England when
Bradwardine, Archbishop of Canterbury, died of it at Lambeth
on August 2Gth, 1349, one week only after his arrival at Dover,
with the fatal botch in the armpits. Long before this, thousands
had fled from the various cities of Europe and Asia. The
Bosphorus was subsidised by Constantinople, while Naples
fled to the slopes of Mount Vesuvius, Rome to the Alban Hills,
Florence to the Apennines, London to Epsom or the New
Forest, and Edinburgh to the Braid Hills,
while, away over the
sea, Damascus was makinsg tracks for the Lebanon, and Cairo
for the Lybian Desert, and Delhi, under Tughlak, was being
shovelled wholesale to Dowlatabad. I stop not to inquire the
reason why. Famine was in evidence and plague in India
in 1345.

The duration of the Black Death in London was seven
to eight months, and in all England fourteen months, the
population of the city being then about 200,000. It had the
same duration as the plague of 1666, the same curve of
increase, maximum intensity, and decrease. The five highest
weeks of 1563 were successively in deaths, 1,454, 1,626, 1,372,
1,828 and 1,262 ; and 1348 resembled it.

At Avignon it was very fierce: sixty-seven Carmelite
monks were found dead in one monastery, no one outside
having heard that the plague was among them. In the English
College the whole of the monks were said to have died of it.

At first science and its students walked up boldly to it.
It was belabouring an elephant with a feather. They then
pelted it with nostrums. The Black Death would be neither
scotched nor killed, and laughed at science and empiricism.
The wisest doctors of the age in every country in which it
appeared were confounded. How and whence it came, how
long it would remain, over what area it would spread — the
Black Death was inscrutable.
The disease defied investigation
and cure. Petrarch tells us, " If you question the philosophers
they shrug their shoulders, wrinkle their brows, and lay the
finger on the lip"; or, as Lucretius wrote in reference to the
plague in Egypt, " The healing art muttered low in voiceless
fear." All the medical records of 1348-49, if printed, would
not fill one of our daily newspapers. The sovereignty of man
lies hid in knowledge. How much do ive know about it ?



Meanwhile Kali, with her necklace of human skulls, secure
in her seat, rode on in triumph, conquering and to conquer.
You may find her footprints on the mounds of Delhi, as well as
in the ruins of Memphis, for it was she who made them both.
Everything consumable was to be burned up ; and until that
came to pass there would be no end to the great tragedy which
involved twenty-five millions of human beings.



The disease now among us in 1898 is the same as the Black
Death of 1348.


It is the same in its causes, its antecedents, and
its mortal effects. Its characteristics are mostly the same. Its
violence and rapidity are in cases as intense, though its contagious-
ness is less apparent. The exception of the general immunity
of Europeans from attack hitherto has proved a stupendous mercy
for us all. But, in its sweep, the plague of 1348 far exceeds
our own ; for it took a much more extended range, embraced
an area wide as the known earth, desolated some of its fairest
regions, and swept a majority of population from the greatest
cities of the world. Asia Minor, for example, seems never to
have recovered from its desolating effects. The two catastrophes,
as far as we know, were the same in their origin. Man, and
man alone, was responsible for them both. Man does not make
the earthquake, the cyclone, or the thunderbolt; but he makes
the pestilence. It is he, and he alone, who allows filth to
accumulate, surround and enter his dwelling, soak into the
soil, and impregnate it with its deadly poison. This is not
" the act of God or the Queen's enemies " (as the old shipping
documents express it). Frankenstein creates the monster that
destroys ' him ; or as Homer hath it, " We blame the gods for
that, of which we ourselves are the authors." We have been
seeking for its origin in many places ; and as distance lends
enchantment to the view, we have gone to Hongkong, to the
slopes of the Himalayas, the roof of the world, or the back of
the east wind. " It is not in heaven, neither is it beyond the
sea, that thou shouldest say, who shall go over the sea for it and
bring it to us ? " It is verily at your own doors at Mandvie,
190 foot above the level of high tide. Volney remarks, "In
a crowded population, and under a hot sun and in a soil filled
deep with water during several months of every year, the rapid
putrefaction of bodies becomes a leaven of plague and other
disease." And Creighton, a hundred years thereafter {Epidemics
of Britain, 891): "Given a soil charged with animal matter,
the risk of those living upon it is in proportion to the range of
fluctuation of the ground water."

The reader need not be reminded that a considerable portion
of Bombay is under the level of high tide,and presents obvious
difficulties to the drainage engineer. Add to this the volume
of water which is poured in day and night by the Tulsi and
Tansa aqueducts, and the fact that there are wide spaces in
Donibay where there are more people crammed within the
same area than in any city in the world.

Each of these plagueswas heralded by the same antecedents. You remember the
great rain of 1896. It rained day and night consecutively inBombay for two or three months

(eighty-seven inches) almost
without intermission.

This was in June, July and part of
August, followed, of course, by tropical heat. There were
people who remarked at the time that such an abnormal rain
would be followed by some abnormal disease. Once the word
plague " flashed across the mind it was summarily dis-
missed as unworthy of suspicion. The plague was discovered
3rd in September, 1896. This great rain had its counterpart
in Italy in 1348, where it fell almost without a
break from Michaelmas to Candlemas. Then the rats (those
awful rats which devoured Sennacherib's bowstrings) in both
cases came forth from their holes, half choked, driven to the
surface seeking for air, a ghastly premonition, staggering at
first as if drunk, and littering the alleys with their dead bodies.
Dead rats have ever been an accompaniment of the plague.

In ancient Memphis there was a statue of Horus with outstretc hed
arm, on the palm of which was a rat saltant, with this inscrip-
tion : " Look at me and learn to reverence the gods.
"
when houses were deserted or shut up, robbers went afoot to pillage them,-
People shut themselves up in country houses, and unwittingly
enclosed the enemy also within their gates, or, fleeing for very
life, went on board some old hulk ; as well get quit of their
own shadows.
The only highly-paid and fully-employed
labourer was the grave-digger, until he also toppled over.

Everything that was of use before became suddenly of no
account. "All that a man hath will he give for his life" —
money, lands, houses, furniture, plate or the costliest jewels.
Industry and trade ceased to exist. Debtor and creditor were
merely names. Ambition was a rotten virtue ; what was the
use of economy ?

" Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die."

Yesterday
morning a corpse was seen lying on the edge of the Queen's
road,

and to-day (March I7th) two others on the same side-
way.

These were samples — the last remains of a hundred
" unknown residents " — nondescripts who now are sowing the
earth with their ashes.

You understand the reason of what
has now ripened itself into a custom. In the darkness of the
night, and perhaps when there might be still a glimmer of light,
they had been dropped near the burning ghaut. Relatives
have, you see, no further trouble and expense. Government
cremates, and the surviving tenants are protected from evic-
tion. It is here you see the sacred relations of father and
mother, wife and children, brother and sister, which have been
established and everything comprehended in that sacred word " family," cast to the
winds, and the bonds which bind society together broken and
destroyed. Can a greater evil befall humanity than this?

Buboes in groins and arm-pit have been the concomitants
and, in each of these plagues, indications of the disease. There
was the same delirium. A man would run across the street
and fall down dead. With the dawn of day dozens of dead
bodies, nameless and unknown, were found in wells, ashpits,
dunghills, sewers and street corners. Many had been aban-
doned by their relations, and some had committed suicide
And happy was he who at sunset could say with the Emperor,
" I haye lived a day."

When the total losses of the first twelve weeks of 1898
were counted up, there had fallen 20,000,

and the plague was not stayed. I suppose that few of the great battlefields of
history have presented a more formidable list of dead and
dying than the city of Bombay in the first three months of
1898.

For some days the only traffic observable in the streets
was the wood wherewith to burn the dead. In the plague of
1348 it was the dead that menaced the living. Cremation has
happily, in part, saved us from this great catastrophe. At first
we were curious and anxious, then dull and stupid, now we are
callous and indifferent, and the daily mortuary returns of 300
to many people awaken as little interest as the figures in an
account-book or multiplication table. In the funerals that pass
I observe that the body of the deceased makes very little
appearance. The corpse, as a rule, is "unco wee," as the
Scotch would say, or bulks but little under the mortcloth ;
and this leads me to believe that the harvest of death has been
reaped among the weak and the wasted, whether from famine
or disease. The lowest stratum has been the first attacked —
those who were destitute of good food, warm clothing, or good
lodging. Those who had none at all have fallen an easy prey
to the insatiable devourer. So was it with the Black Death.
Its effects on the labouring class are displayed in the preamble
of the Statute of Labourers, November 18th, 1350. "Foras-
much as a great part of the people, principally of artisans and
labourers, is dead of the late pestilence." In the worst dens
and hovels of the disease — and some of them are several stories
high — you see to-day houses that have been unroofed to let in
the light, dislocated tiles, and rafters dirty and blackened,
cleaving the skyline,